Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33147621›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2020

Effects of dopamine on reinforcement learning in Parkinson's disease depend on motor phenotype.

Annelies J van Nuland, Rick C Helmich, Michiel F Dirkx, Heidemarie Zach, Ivan Toni, Roshan Cools, Hanneke E M den Ouden

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Cortical dopamine reduces the impact of motivational biases governing automated behaviour.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Author Response to Macpherson et al.Physical therapy · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Annelies J van NulandRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Rick C HelmichRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Michiel F DirkxRadboud University Medical Centre, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Neurology, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Heidemarie ZachRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ivan ToniRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Roshan CoolsRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Hanneke E M den OudenRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

EPA EP-C-14-005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parkinson's disease is clinically defined by bradykinesia, along with rigidity and tremor. However, the severity of these motor signs is greatly variable between individuals, particularly the presence or absence of tremor. This variability in tremor relates to variation in cognitive/motivational impairment, as well as the spatial distribution of neurodegeneration in the midbrain and dopamine depletion in the striatum. Here we ask whether interindividual heterogeneity in tremor symptoms could account for the puzzlingly large variability in the effects of dopaminergic medication on reinforcement learning, a fundamental cognitive function known to rely on dopamine. Given that tremor-dominant and non-tremor Parkinson's disease patients have different dopaminergic phenotypes, we hypothesized that effects of dopaminergic medication on reinforcement learning differ between tremor-dominant and non-tremor patients. Forty-three tremor-dominant and 20 non-tremor patients with Parkinson's disease were recruited to be tested both OFF and ON dopaminergic medication (200/50 mg levodopa-benserazide), while 22 age-matched control subjects were recruited to be tested twice OFF medication. Participants performed a reinforcement learning task designed to dissociate effects on learning rate from effects on motivational choice (i.e. the tendency to 'Go/NoGo' in the face of reward/threat of punishment). In non-tremor patients, dopaminergic medication improved reward-based choice, replicating previous studies. In contrast, in tremor-dominant patients, dopaminergic medication improved learning from punishment. Formal modelling showed divergent computational effects of dopaminergic medication as a function of Parkinson's disease motor phenotype, with a modulation of motivational choice bias and learning rate in non-tremor and tremor patients, respectively. This finding establishes a novel cognitive/motivational difference between tremor and non-tremor Parkinson's disease patients, and highlights the importance of considering motor phenotype in future work.

Indexed as

Conditioning, OperantLearningAgedAntiparkinson AgentsBenserazideComputer SimulationDopamine AgonistsDrug CombinationsFemaleHumansLevodopaMaleMiddle AgedMotivationParkinson DiseasePhenotypeAntiparkinson AgentsBenserazidebenserazide, levodopa drug combinationDopamine AgonistsDrug CombinationsLevodopadopamineParkinson’s diseasereinforcement learningtremor

Identifiers

PMID33147621
PMCPMC7719026
OpenAlexW3096103851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.