Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33147603›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Adapting the reverse pyramid airplane boarding method for social distancing in times of COVID-19.

R John Milne, Liviu-Adrian Cotfas, Camelia Delcea, Liliana Crăciun, Anca-Gabriela Molănescu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. COVID-19 environmental and operational impact for public transport in Kuwait.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Seat Assignments With Physical Distancing in Single-Destination Public Transit Settings.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

R John MilneDavid D. Reh School of Business, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY, United States of America.
Liviu-Adrian CotfasDepartment of Economic Informatics and Cybernetics, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-4192-183X
Camelia DelceaDepartment of Economic Informatics and Cybernetics, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-3589-1969
Liliana CrăciunDepartment of Economics and Economic Policies, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania.
Anca-Gabriela MolănescuDepartment of Economics and Economic Policies, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania.
Bucharest University of Economic Studies · ROClarkson University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social distancing resulting from the new coronavirus (SARS-CoV2) has disrupted the airplane boarding process. Social distancing norms reduce airplane capacity by keeping the middle seats unoccupied, while an imposed aisle social distance between boarding passengers slows the boarding. Recent literature suggests the Reverse Pyramid boarding method is a promising way to reduce health risk and keep boarding times low when 10 apron buses (essentially 10 boarding groups) are used to transport passengers from the airport terminal to a two-door airplane. We adapt the Reverse Pyramid method for social distancing when an airplane is boarded using a jet bridge that connects the terminal the airplane's front door. We vary the number of boarding groups from two to six and use stochastic simulation and agent-based modelling to show the resulting impact on four performance evaluation metrics. Increasing the number of boarding groups from two to six reduces boarding time only up to four groups but continues to reduce infection risk up to six groups. If the passengers carry fewer luggage aboard the airplane, health risks (as well as boarding times) decrease. One adaptation of the Reverse Pyramid (RP) method (RP-Spread) provides slightly faster boarding times than the other (RP-Steep), when luggage volumes are high, while RP-Steep results in less risk to window seat passengers from later-boarding passengers walking by their row. Increasing the minimum aisle social distance from 1 m to 2 m increases boarding times but results in lower health risks to passengers walking down the aisle and to the previously seated passengers they pass.

Indexed as

AircraftPsychological DistanceAir TravelComputer SimulationCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19CrowdingHumansPandemicsPneumonia, ViralResearch DesignTime FactorsWalking

Identifiers

PMID33147603
PMCPMC7641653
OpenAlexW3096924207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.