Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33147478›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2020

A Global Minimization Toolkit for Batch-Fitting and χ

William R Lindemann, Ty Christoff-Tempesta, Julia H Ortony

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

William R LindemannDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Ty Christoff-TempestaDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Julia H OrtonyDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Electronic address: ortony@mit.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy (EPR) is a uniquely powerful technique for characterizing conformational dynamics at specific sites within a broad range of molecular species in water. Computational tools for fitting EPR spectra have enabled dynamics parameters to be determined quantitatively. These tools have dramatically broadened the capabilities of EPR dynamics analysis, however, their implementation can easily lead to overfitting or problems with self-consistency. As a result, dynamics parameters and associated properties become difficult to reliably determine, particularly in the slow-motion regime. Here, we present an EPR analysis strategy and the corresponding computational tool for batch-fitting EPR spectra and cluster analysis of the χ

Indexed as

Electron Spin Resonance SpectroscopyCluster AnalysisDiffusionReproducibility of ResultsSpin LabelsSpin Labels

Identifiers

PMID33147478
PMCPMC7732748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.