ArticleJornal de pediatria
The general movement checklist: A guide to the assessment of general movements during preterm and term age.
Article in Jornal de pediatria. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cerebral oxygenation during immediate fetal-to-neonatal transition and fidgety movements between six to 20 weeks of corrected age: An ancillary study to the COSGOD III trial.European journal of pediatrics · 2024Trial
- Clinical characteristics and outcomes of early-onset neonatal bacterial meningitis: a 20-year retrospective comparison of preterm and full-term infants.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Repeatability of Myotonometric Muscle Measurements in Infants Aged 0-3 Months: Toward an Objective Tool Supporting Early Motor Assessment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- "Implementation of general movements assessment for early detection and treatment of infants at-risk of cerebral palsy - translating evidence into practice in a low resource setting".BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- A machine learning study highlighting the challenges of fidgety movement recognition using vision and inertial sensors.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Early Upper Limb Function in Infants Under Three Months: Associations with Shoulder Biomechanics and General Movement Patterns.Pediatric reports · 2025Article
- Sex-Related Differences in Hip Kinematics During General Movements in Early Infancy: A Biomechanical Cross-Sectional Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Writhing Movements and Hypoglycemia in Moderate-Late Preterm Infants: A Prospective Cohort Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Prechtl's method to assess general movements: Inter-rater reliability during the preterm period.PloS one · 2024Article
- Design and Construct Validity of a Postural Control Test for Pre-Term Infants.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The Importance of Monitoring Neurodevelopmental Outcomes for Preterm Infants: A Comparison of the AIMS, GMA, Pull to Sit Maneuver and ASQ-3.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Spontaneous Orofacial Movements at Writhing and Fidgety General Movements Age in Preterm and Full-Term Infants.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Assessing the Utility of Neonatal Screening Assessments in Early Diagnosis of Cerebral Palsy in Preterm Infants.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo develop a checklist describing features of normal and abnormal general movements in order to guide General Movement Assessment novices through the assessment procedure, to provide a quantification of General Movement Assessment; and to demonstrate that normal and abnormal GMs can be distinguished on the basis of a metric checklist score.
methodsThree examiners used General Movement Assessment and the newly developed GM checklist to assess 20 videos of 16 infants (seven males) recorded at 31-45 weeks postmenstrual age (writhing general movements). Inter- and intra-scorer agreement was determined for General Movement Assessment (nominal data; Kappa values) and the checklist score (metric scale ranging from 0 to 26; Intraclass Correlation values). The scorers' satisfaction with the usefulness of the checklist was assessed by means of a short questionnaire (score 10 for maximum satisfaction).
resultsThe scorers' satisfaction ranged from 8.44 to 9.14, which indicates high satisfaction. The median checklist score of the nine videos showing normal general movements was significantly higher than that of the eleven videos showing abnormal general movements (26 vs. 11, p<0.001). The checklist score also differentiated between poor-repertoire (median=13) and cramped-synchronized general movements (median=7; p=0.002). Inter- and intra-scorer agreement on (i) normal vs. abnormal general movements was good to excellent (Kappa=0.68-1.00); (ii) the distinction between the four general movement categories was considerable to excellent (Kappa=0.56-0.93); (iii) the checklist was good to excellent (ICC=0.77-0.96).
conclusionThe general movement checklist proved an important tool for the evaluation of normal and abnormal general movements; its score may potentially document individual trajectories and the effect of therapeutic intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.