Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33147374›Full record

ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2020

Normative values of muscle strength across ages in a 'real world' population: results from the longevity check-up 7+ project.

Francesco Landi, Riccardo Calvani, Anna Maria Martone, Sara Salini, Maria Beatrice Zazzara, Matteo Candeloro, Hélio José Coelho-Junior, Matteo Tosato, Anna Picca, Emanuele Marzetti

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07362329 (Use of Resistive Exercise Snacks to Improve Upper Body Fitness in Graduate Students), which is not on this map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07362329 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Use of Resistive Exercise Snacks to Improve Upper Body Fitness in Graduate Students

TypeinterventionalSponsorNew York Institute of TechnologyRan2026 to 2026Enrolled50ConditionsMuscle Strength, Muscle Power, Physical EnduranceArmsSubmaximal Repeated Exercise Snack, Maximal One-Time Exercise Snack
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Francesco LandiCenter for Geriatric Medicine (CEMI), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario 'Agostino Gemelli' IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Riccardo CalvaniCenter for Geriatric Medicine (CEMI), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario 'Agostino Gemelli' IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Anna Maria MartoneCenter for Geriatric Medicine (CEMI), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario 'Agostino Gemelli' IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Sara SaliniCenter for Geriatric Medicine (CEMI), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario 'Agostino Gemelli' IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Maria Beatrice ZazzaraCenter for Geriatric Medicine (CEMI), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario 'Agostino Gemelli' IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Matteo CandeloroDipartimento di Medicina e Scienze dell'Invecchiamento, Università G. D'Annunzio, Chieti, Italy.
Hélio José Coelho-JuniorUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Institute of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Rome, Italy.
Matteo TosatoCenter for Geriatric Medicine (CEMI), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario 'Agostino Gemelli' IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Anna PiccaCenter for Geriatric Medicine (CEMI), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario 'Agostino Gemelli' IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7032-3487
Emanuele MarzettiCenter for Geriatric Medicine (CEMI), Fondazione Policlinico Universitario 'Agostino Gemelli' IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9567-6983
Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity of Chieti-Pescara · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow muscle strength is a powerful predictor of negative health-related events and a key component of sarcopenia. The lack of normative values for muscle strength across ages hampers the practical appraisal of this parameter. The aim of the present study was to produce normative values for upper and lower extremity muscle strength across a wide spectrum of ages, in a large sample of community-dwellers recruited in the Longevity check-up (Lookup) 7+ project.

methodsLookup 7+ is an ongoing project that started in June 2015 and conducted in unconventional settings (i.e. exhibitions, malls, and health promotion campaigns) across Italy with the aim of fostering the adoption of healthy lifestyles in the general population. Candidate participants are eligible for enrolment if they are 18+ years and provide written informed consent. Upper and lower extremity muscle strength is assessed by handgrip strength and five-repetition chair-stand [5 × sit-to-stand (STS)] tests, respectively. Cross-sectional centile and normative values for handgrip strength and 5 × STS tests from age 18 to 80+ years were generated for the two genders. Smoothed normative curves for the two tests were constructed for men and women using the lambda-mu-sigma method.

resultsFrom 1 June 2015 to 30 May 2019, 11 448 participants were enrolled. The mean age of participants was 55.6 years (standard deviation: 11.5 years; range: 18-98 years), and 6382 (56%) were women. Normative values for handgrip strength and the 5 × STS test, both absolute and normalized by body mass index, were obtained for men and women, stratified by age groups. Values of upper and lower extremity muscle strength across ages identified three periods in life: an increase to peak in young age and early adulthood (18-24 years), preservation through midlife (25-44 years), and a decline from midlife onwards (45+ years).

conclusionsOur study established age-specific and gender-specific percentile reference values for handgrip strength and the 5 × STS test. The normative curves generated can be used to interpret the assessment of muscle strength in everyday practice for the early detection of individuals with or at risk of sarcopenia.

Indexed as

LongevityMuscle StrengthAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHand StrengthHumansMaleMiddle AgedSarcopeniaYoung AdultChair-stand testEarly diagnosisEWGSOP2Handgrip strengthSarcopeniaScreening

Identifiers

PMID33147374
PMCPMC7749608
OpenAlexW3095857172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.