Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33147116›Full record

Trial reportWomen's health (London, England)

Experiences of a multiple intervention trial to increase maternity care access in rural Tanzania: Focus group findings with women, nurses and community health workers.

Gail Webber, Bwire Chirangi, Nyamusi Magatti

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gail WebberDepartment of Family Medicine, Bruyere Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4212-4178
Bwire ChirangiShirati KMT Hospital, Mara, Tanzania.
Nyamusi MagattiShirati KMT Hospital, Mara, Tanzania.
Aga Khan Hospital Dar es Salaam · TZUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn order to improve maternal health and women's access to maternity care services in Rorya District, Mara, Northern Tanzania, we introduced several interventions across the district from 2018 to 2019. The interventions were workshops with nurses to encourage respectful care of women and transportation subsidies for women to reach the health facilities for delivery. In addition, we trained community health workers to educate couples about safe birthing options using m-health applications, to collaborate with nurses to distribute clean birth kits with misoprostol and to hold village meetings to shift community norms. This article reports on the experiences of women, community health workers and nurses during the study.

methodsFocus group discussions were conducted with a convenience sample of these groups to understand the successes and challenges of the interventions.

resultsThe workshops with nurses to encourage respectful maternity care and the birth kits with misoprostol were appreciated by all and were an incentive for women to seek health services. While the m-health applications were innovative, the system required significant oversight and a stable network. The village meetings demonstrated some success and should be expanded. Travel subsidies were problematic to implement and only helpful to the minority who received them.

conclusionMultiple intervention strategies are needed to help women access maternity care services in rural locations and should be designed to meet needs within the local context. In Rorya District, access to quality health care was improved through training nurses to provide respectful care and using community health workers to educate the population about safe birthing practices and to provide women with clean birth kits. Despite the current limitations of m-health, there is much potential for development. Finding solutions to women's need for transport is a particular challenge and will likely require innovative community-based approaches.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersHealth Services AccessibilityNursesPrenatal CareFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaternal Health ServicesPregnancyQualitative ResearchRural PopulationTanzaniabirth kitscommunity health workersfacility birthsmaternal mortalitymaternity carem-healthmisoprostolTanzania

Identifiers

PMID33147116
PMCPMC7649916
OpenAlexW3095706597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.