ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2022
Effect of PET-CT misalignment on the quantitative accuracy of cardiac
Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- A deep-learning-based pipeline for automatic fusion of CT coronary angiogram and stress perfusion CMR.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Detection and correction of patient motion in dynamicJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Article
- A retrospective evaluation of Bayesian-penalized likelihood reconstruction for [Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Article
- Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2022: positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Review
- Influence of image reconstruction on quantitative cardiacJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Article
- Diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy using non-ECG-gatedJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022Article
- Influence of patient motion on quantitative accuracy in cardiacJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022Article
- CardiacJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022Article
- Pitfalls on PET/CT Due to Artifacts and Instrumentation.Seminars in nuclear medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on byCardiac2022
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundQuantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) with PET requires accurate attenuation correction, which is performed using a separate CT. Misalignment between PET and CT scans has been reported to be a common problem. The purpose of the present study was to assess the effect of PET CT misalignment on the quantitative accuracy of cardiac
methodsTen clinical patients referred for evaluation of ischemia and assessment of MBF with
resultsMBF was only minorly affected by misalignments, but larger effects were seen in MBFt. On the global level, average absolute deviation across all misalignments for MBF was 1.7% ± 1.4% and for MBFt 5.4% ± 3.2 Largest deviation for MBF was - 4.8% ± 5.8% (LCX, X + 20) and for MBFt - 19.3% ± 9.6% (LCX, X + 20). In general, larger effects were seen in LAD and LCX compared to in RCA.
conclusionThe quantitative accuracy of MBF from
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.