ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021
Innovation and environmental total factor productivity in China: the moderating roles of economic policy uncertainty and marketization process.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of "Three Red Lines" Water Policy (2011) on Water Usage Efficiency, Production Technology Heterogeneity, and Determinant of Water Productivity Change in China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
China's economic development practices are facing strict energy constraints and severe environmental pollution. Improvement of China's environmental total factor productivity (ETFP) through innovation is a major scientific focus of both policy-makers and academia. However, the boundary conditions where innovation affects ETFP are yet to be clarified. On this basis, the present study starts from two dimensions-policy context and market context, introduces economic policy uncertainty (EPU) and marketization process as moderating variables, and examines the impact mechanism of innovation on ETFP. The results show the following: (1) Innovation promotes ETFP. (2) Although EPU inhibits ETFP, it positively moderates the impact of innovation on ETFP. (3) The marketization process has an insignificant inhibitory effect on ETFP. Specifically, the development of product markets, the development of market intermediary organizations, and the legal system environment have a significant inhibitory effect on ETFP. In contrast, the marketization process positively moderates the impact of innovation on ETFP. (4) The impact of innovation on ETFP exhibits obvious regional heterogeneity. In regions with low pollution intensity, innovation and EPU promotes ETFP. The marketization process inhibits ETFP and shows a positive moderating effect. In regions with high pollution intensity, both innovation and EPU inhibits ETFP. Based on these conclusions, policy-makers should guide companies to increase investment in research and development, improve innovation capabilities, and focus on strengthening energy-saving and environmental protection technologies and process innovations. When formulating and adjusting economic policies, policy-makers should aim promote enterprise innovation and reduce the negative impact of economic policy uncertainty. Policies should fully utilize the decisive role of the market in the allocation of innovative factors and rely on market mechanisms to enhance the positive effect of innovation on regional ETFP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33146825What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.