Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33146812›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2021

Morphology of the major papilla predicts ERCP procedural outcomes and adverse events.

Rachid Mohamed, B Cord Lethebe, Emmanuel Gonzalez-Moreno, Ahmed Kayal, Sydney Bass, Martin Cole, Christian Turbide, Millie Chau, Hannah F Koury, Darren R Brenner and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04259580 (Calgary Registry for Advanced and Therapeutic Endoscopy), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04259580 recruitingnot on this map

Calgary Registry for Advanced and Therapeutic Endoscopy

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity of CalgaryRan2018 to 2030Enrolled6,000ConditionsBiliary Disease, Pancreatic DiseasesArmsEndoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERCP)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Rachid MohamedDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
B Cord LethebeCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Emmanuel Gonzalez-MorenoDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Ahmed KayalDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Sydney BassDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Martin ColeDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Christian TurbideDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Millie ChauDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Hannah F KouryCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Darren R BrennerDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Robert J HilsdenDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
B Joseph ElmunzerDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Rajesh N KeswaniDivision of Gastroenterology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Sachin WaniDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Steven J HeitmanDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Nauzer ForbesDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. nauzer.forbes@ucalgary.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-6966-3908
University of Calgary · CAAlberta Health Services · CAMedical University of South Carolina · USNorthwestern University · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · US

Funding

Proteomics CoreP30DK123704 · NIDDK · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI DON C. ROCKEY · 2020 to 2026
$8.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK123704
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe morphology of the major papilla affects the difficulty of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), but no associations with adverse events have previously been established. We aimed to assess whether papillary morphology predicts ERCP adverse events.

methodsA retrospective analysis was performed of a prospective registry of patients undergoing ERCP for biliary indications. The primary outcome was post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), with secondary outcomes including other adverse events and procedural outcomes such as inadvertent pancreatic duct cannulation, cannulation time, and attempts. Papillae were classified as normal (Type I), small or flat (Type II), bulging (Type IIIa), pendulous (Type IIIb), creased (Type IV), or peri-diverticular (Type D). Outcomes were ascertained prospectively at 30 days from index procedures.

resultsA total of 637 patients with native papillae were included. Compared to Type I papillae, Type II and Type IIIb papillae were associated with PEP, with adjusted odds ratios (AOR) of 7.28 (95% confidence intervals, CI, 1.84-28.74) and 4.25 (95% CI 1.26-14.32), respectively. Type II and IIIb papillae were associated with significantly longer cannulation times by 5.37 (95% CI 2.39-8.35) and 4.01 (95% CI 1.72-6.30) minutes, respectively. Type IIIb papillae were associated with lower deep cannulation success (AOR 0.17, 95% CI 0.06-0.48).

conclusionPapillary morphology is an important factor influencing both ERCP success and outcomes. Understanding this is key for managing intraprocedural approaches and minimizing adverse events. PROSPECTIVE REGISTRY REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT04259580.

Indexed as

Ampulla of VaterCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeCatheterizationHumansRetrospective StudiesSphincterotomy, EndoscopicBile ductsERCPPancreatitis

Identifiers

PMID33146812
PMCPMC8806980
OpenAlexW3096106542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.