Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33146811›Full record

Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2021

The modified endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy versus antibiotic therapy alone for acute uncomplicated appendicitis in children.

Jianqin Kang, Wei Zhang, Lingchao Zeng, Yan Lin, Junqing Wu, Nini Zhang, Xiaomin Xie, Yu Zhang, Xiangzeng Liu, Baoxi Wang and 2 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jianqin Kang *Department of Pediatrics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 1 Xinsi Road, Xi'an, 710038, Shaanxi Province, China.
Wei Zhang *Department of Pediatrics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 1 Xinsi Road, Xi'an, 710038, Shaanxi Province, China.
Lingchao ZengDepartment of Pediatrics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 1 Xinsi Road, Xi'an, 710038, Shaanxi Province, China. zlc51@163.com.
Yan LinDepartment of Pediatrics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 1 Xinsi Road, Xi'an, 710038, Shaanxi Province, China.
Junqing WuDepartment of Pediatrics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 1 Xinsi Road, Xi'an, 710038, Shaanxi Province, China.
Nini ZhangDepartment of Pediatrics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 1 Xinsi Road, Xi'an, 710038, Shaanxi Province, China.
Xiaomin XieDepartment of Pediatrics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 1 Xinsi Road, Xi'an, 710038, Shaanxi Province, China.
Yu ZhangDepartment of Pediatrics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 1 Xinsi Road, Xi'an, 710038, Shaanxi Province, China.
Xiangzeng LiuDepartment of Pediatrics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 1 Xinsi Road, Xi'an, 710038, Shaanxi Province, China.
Baoxi WangDepartment of Pediatrics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 1 Xinsi Road, Xi'an, 710038, Shaanxi Province, China.
Ruijing YangDepartment of Ultrasonics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 1 Xinsi Road, Xi'an, 710038, Shaanxi Province, China.
Xun JiangDepartment of Pediatrics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 1 Xinsi Road, Xi'an, 710038, Shaanxi Province, China. 863756276@qq.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3344-4797
Air Force Medical University · CNTang Du Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT) is an emerging endoscopic treatment modality for acute uncomplicated appendicitis (AUA) supported by several case series. However, to date, systematic studies have not been conducted in children and the prospective comparative data are lacking. Moreover, due to a concern for future malignancy risk in children from ionizing radiation, we used contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) instead of endoscopic retrograde appendiceal radiography (ERAR). Therefore, we conducted a prospective, randomized control clinical trial to compare the modified ERAT (mERAT) to antibiotic therapy in children with AUA. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility and of mERAT in the treatment of hospitalized children with AUA.

methodsChildren with AUA, confirmed by ultrasonography and or abdominal computed tomography, were consecutively enrolled from October 2018 to February, 2020. They were randomly assigned to receive mERAT or routine antibiotic treatment. Patients were followed until May, 2020. Th primary outcome variable was the duration of relief of the abdominal pain after treatment. We collected patient's demographics, ultrasonic imaging findings, colonoscopy findings, and treatment outcomes of the mERAT and adverse even associated with mERAT.

resultsA total of 83 children were enrolled. 36 were randomized to mERAT and 47 to antibiotics treatment. All children in the mERAT group had endoscopic confirmed acute uncomplicated appendicitis, and there were no significant complications. However, 9 of patients in antibiotic group were poor responsive to treatment and switched to mERAT. The overall success rate of treatment with mERAT (100%) was significantly higher than that of antibiotics (80.9%) (P = 0.004). The median time to discharge was significantly shorter in mERAT group than in antibiotics treatment group [6.0 ± 1.76 days] (P = 0.004).

conclusionsmERAT provide a new alternative therapeutic option for childhood with AUA, especially for families who are reluctant to undergo an appendectomy.

Indexed as

AppendicitisAppendixAcute DiseaseAnti-Bacterial AgentsAppendectomyChildHumansProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsAcute appendicitisColonoscopyEndoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapyEndoscopic therapyMicrobubble contrast enhanced ultrasoundMinimal invasive therapy

Identifiers

PMID33146811
OpenAlexW3095407790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.