Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33146804›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI physics2020

High-quality brain perfusion SPECT images may be achieved with a high-speed recording using 360° CZT camera.

Manon Bordonne, Mohammad B Chawki, Pierre-Yves Marie, Timothée Zaragori, Véronique Roch, Rachel Grignon, Laetitia Imbert, Antoine Verger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. EANM practice guidelines for an appropriate use of PET and SPECT for patients with epilepsy.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Quantitative accuracy ofEJNMMI physics · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Bias and precision of SPECT-basedEJNMMI physics · 2024
    Article
  12. 360° CZT-SPECT/CT cameras:EJNMMI physics · 2024
    Article
  13. EANM perspectives for CZT SPECT in brain applications.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Dopamine transporter (DAT) imaging in Parkinson's disease and related disorders.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. EANM procedure guidelines for brain PET imaging using [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Manon BordonneDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Nancyclotep Imaging Platform, CHRU-Nancy, Université de Lorraine, F-54000, Nancy, France.
Mohammad B ChawkiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Nancyclotep Imaging Platform, CHRU-Nancy, Université de Lorraine, F-54000, Nancy, France.
Pierre-Yves MarieDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Nancyclotep Imaging Platform, CHRU-Nancy, Université de Lorraine, F-54000, Nancy, France.
Timothée ZaragoriUniversité de Lorraine, INSERM U1254, IADI, F-54000, Nancy, France.
Véronique RochDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Nancyclotep Imaging Platform, CHRU-Nancy, Université de Lorraine, F-54000, Nancy, France.
Rachel GrignonDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Nancyclotep Imaging Platform, CHRU-Nancy, Université de Lorraine, F-54000, Nancy, France.
Laetitia ImbertDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Nancyclotep Imaging Platform, CHRU-Nancy, Université de Lorraine, F-54000, Nancy, France. l.imbert@chru-nancy.fr.
Antoine VergerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Nancyclotep Imaging Platform, CHRU-Nancy, Université de Lorraine, F-54000, Nancy, France.
Inserm · FRUniversité de Lorraine · FRCentre de Médecine Préventive · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to compare brain perfusion SPECT obtained from a 360° CZT and a conventional Anger camera.

methodsThe 360° CZT camera utilizing a brain configuration, with 12 detectors surrounding the head, was compared to a 2-head Anger camera for count sensitivity and image quality on 30-min SPECT recordings from a brain phantom and from

resultsThe CZT camera provided more than 2-fold increase in count sensitivity, as compared with the Anger camera, as well as (1) lower sharpness indexes, giving evidence of higher spatial resolution, for both peripheral/central brain structures, with respective median values of 5.2%/3.7% versus 2.4%/1.9% for CZT and Anger camera respectively in patients (p < 0.01), and 8.0%/6.9% versus 6.2%/3.7% on phantom; and (2) higher gray/white matter contrast on peripheral/central structures, with respective ratio median values of 1.56/1.35 versus 1.11/1.20 for CZT and Anger camera respectively in patients (p < 0.05), and 2.57/2.17 versus 1.40/1.12 on phantom; and (3) no change in noise level. Image quality, scored visually by experienced physicians, was also significantly higher on CZT than on the Anger camera (+ 80%, p < 0.01), and all these results were unchanged on the CZT images obtained with only a 15 min recording time.

conclusionThe 360° CZT camera provides brain perfusion images of much higher quality than a conventional Anger camera, even with high-speed recordings, thus demonstrating the potential for repositioning brain perfusion SPECT to the forefront of brain imaging.

Indexed as

Brain perfusionCount sensitivityCZTImage qualitySPECT

Identifiers

PMID33146804
PMCPMC7642149
OpenAlexW3097062691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.