Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33146778›Full record

Trial reportParasitology research2021

Heterogeneous response of Wuchereria bancrofti-infected persons to diethylcarbamazine (DEC) and its implications for the Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis (GPELF).

Thirumal Sankari, Swaminathan Subramanian, Subhash L Hoti, Subhada P Pani, Purushothaman Jambulingam, Pradeep K Das

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Parasitology research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thirumal SankariICMR-Vector Control Research Centre, Medical Complex, Indira Nagar, Pondicherry, 605006, India.
Swaminathan SubramanianICMR-Vector Control Research Centre, Medical Complex, Indira Nagar, Pondicherry, 605006, India. ssubra@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0804-0763
Subhash L HotiICMR-National Institute of Traditional Medicine, Nehru Nagar, National Highway No. 4, Belagavi, Karnataka, 590010, India.
Subhada P PaniFaculty of Medicine, Quest International University Perak, Ipoh, Malaysia.
Purushothaman JambulingamICMR-Vector Control Research Centre, Medical Complex, Indira Nagar, Pondicherry, 605006, India.
Pradeep K DasICMR-Vector Control Research Centre, Medical Complex, Indira Nagar, Pondicherry, 605006, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DEC or ivermectin (IVM) in combination with albendazole (ALB) has been the recommended strategy of the Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis (GPELF) since 2000. Despite effective population coverage (> 65%) with several rounds of MDA with DEC or combination of DEC plus ALB, microfilariae persist in few individuals and they continue to be the source of infection for transmitting LF. We report an individual's variability in response to DEC by defining the response as complete absence of microfilaria (mf) (post-treatment mf count = 0) and non-response as presence of mf (post-treatment mf count ≥ 1). We analyzed follow-up data on individual's response to treatment from two randomized clinical trials in which 46 microfilaremic individuals were treated with single-dose DEC (6 mg/kg body weight). They were classified into low, medium, and high mf density categories based on their pre-treatment mf counts. Of the 46 individuals, 65.2% have not responded throughout the 12-month post-treatment period. Application of a logistic regression model with fixed (age, gender, mf density, post-treatment time, and their interactions) and random (individual's response over time) effects indicated that treatment response is independent of age, gender, and time. The overall treatment response increases in low and decreases in high mf density categories. Furthermore, the estimates for the random coefficients model showed that there is a greater variability in response between individuals over post-treatment time. The results substantiate that individual variation in response to DEC exists which indicate the importance of studying the parasite as well as host genetic factors associated with DEC action.

Indexed as

AlbendazoleAnimalsDiethylcarbamazineElephantiasis, FilarialFemaleFilaricidesHumansIvermectinLogistic ModelsMaleMicrofilariaeWuchereria bancroftiAlbendazoleDiethylcarbamazineFilaricidesIvermectinDiethylcarbamazine (DEC)Fixed and random effects modelsLymphatic filariasisResponse to DEC

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.