Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33146284›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica2020

Association between cognitive performance and self-reported glaucoma in middle-aged and older adults: a cross-sectional analysis of ELSA-Brasil.

K S Vidal, C K Suemoto, A B Moreno, B Duncan, M I Schmidt, M Maestri, S M Barreto, P A Lotufo, L Bertola, I M Bensenor and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Beyond vision loss: the impact of glaucoma on the brain.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

K S VidalLaboratório da Visão, Instituto de Psicologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4559-2612
C K SuemotoDivisão de Geriatria, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5942-4778
A B MorenoDepartamento de Epidemiologia e Métodos Quantitativos na Saúde, Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8282-6521
B DuncanDepartamento de Epidemiologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7491-2630
M I SchmidtDepartamento de Epidemiologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3837-0731
M MaestriDepartamento de Oftalmologia e Otorrinolaringologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2821-5073
S M BarretoFaculdade de Medicina e Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7383-7811
P A LotufoDepartamento de Clínica Médica, Hospital Universitário, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4856-8450
L BertolaDepartamento de Medicina Interna, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5771-2576
I M BensenorDepartamento de Clínica Médica, Hospital Universitário, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6723-5678
A R BrunoniDepartamento de Clínica Médica, Hospital Universitário, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6310-3571
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BRHospital Universitário da Universidade de São Paulo · BRDepartamento de Epidemiología · GTHospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that glaucoma and Alzheimer's disease are neurodegenerative diseases sharing common pathophysiological and etiological features, although findings are inconclusive. We sought to investigate whether self-reported glaucoma patients without dementia present poorer cognitive performance, an issue that has been less investigated. We employed cross-sectional data from the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil) and included participants ≥50 years of age without a known diagnosis of dementia and a self-reported glaucoma diagnosis. We excluded those with previous stroke, other eye conditions, and using drugs that could impair cognition. We evaluated cognition using delayed word recall, phonemic verbal fluency, and trail making (version B) tests. We used multinomial linear regression models to investigate associations between self-reported glaucoma with cognition, adjusted by several sociodemographic and clinical variables. Out of 4,331 participants, 139 reported glaucoma. Fully-adjusted models showed that self-reported glaucoma patients presented poorer performance in the verbal fluency test (β=-0.39, 95%CI=-0.64 to -0.14, P=0.002), but not in the other cognitive assessments. Thus, our results support the hypothesis that self-reported glaucoma is associated with poor cognitive performance; however, longitudinal data are necessary to corroborate our findings.

Indexed as

CognitionGlaucomaAgedBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsSelf Report

Identifiers

PMID33146284
PMCPMC7643934
OpenAlexW3094634659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.