Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33145965›Full record

ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2021

First-food systems transformations and the ultra-processing of infant and young child diets: The determinants, dynamics and consequences of the global rise in commercial milk formula consumption.

Phillip Baker, Thiago Santos, Paulo Augusto Neves, Priscila Machado, Julie Smith, Ellen Piwoz, Aluisio J D Barros, Cesar G Victora, David McCoy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Phillip BakerInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0802-2349
Thiago SantosInternational Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Paulo Augusto NevesInternational Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1200-4725
Priscila MachadoInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Julie SmithResearch School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9796-7629
Ellen PiwozBill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Aluisio J D BarrosInternational Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Cesar G VictoraInternational Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
David McCoyCentre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The inappropriate marketing and aggressive promotion of breastmilk substitutes (BMS) undermines breastfeeding and harms child and maternal health in all country contexts. Although a global milk formula 'sales boom' is reportedly underway, few studies have investigated its dynamics and determinants. This study takes two steps. First, it describes trends and patterns in global formula sales volumes (apparent consumption), by country income and region. Data are reported for 77 countries, for the years 2005-19, and for the standard (0-6 months), follow-up (7-12 m), toddler (13-36 m), and special (0-6 m) categories. Second, it draws from the literature to understand how transformations underway in first-food systems - those that provision foods for children aged 0-36 months - explain the global transition to higher formula diets. Total world formula sales grew by 115% between 2005 and 2019, from 3.5 to 7.4 kg/child, led by highly-populated middle-income countries. Growth was rapid in South East and East Asia, especially in China, which now accounts for one third of world sales. This transition is linked with factors that generate demand for BMS, including rising incomes, urbanisation, the changing nature of woman's work, social norms, media influences and medicalisation. It also reflects the globalization of the baby food industry and its supply chains, including the increasing intensity and sophistication of its marketing practices. Policy and regulatory frameworks designed to protect, promote and support breastfeeding are partially or completely inadequate in the majority of countries, hence supporting industry expansion over child nutrition. The results raise serious concern for global child and maternal health.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingInfant FoodChinaDietFemaleHumansInfantInfant FormulaMilk, Humanbreastmilk substitutescommercial determinants of healthinfant and young child feedinginfant formulamarketingnutrition transition

Identifiers

PMID33145965
PMCPMC7988871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.