Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33145902›Full record

ReviewThe oncologist2021

Navigating Diagnostic and Treatment Decisions in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Expert Commentary on the Multidisciplinary Team Approach.

Sanjay Popat, Neal Navani, Keith M Kerr, Egbert F Smit, Timothy J P Batchelor, Paul Van Schil, Suresh Senan, Fiona McDonald

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The oncologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Countdown to lobectomy: interventions to improve waiting times for lung cancer resection.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Lung cancer in the emergency department.Emergency cancer care · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Sanjay PopatLung Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2087-4963
Neal NavaniLungs for Living Research Centre, University College London (UCL) Respiratory, UCL and Department of Thoracic Medicine, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Keith M KerrDepartment of Pathology, Aberdeen University Medical School and Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Egbert F SmitDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, VU University Medical Center and Department of Thoracic Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Timothy J P BatchelorDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston National Health Service Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Paul Van SchilDepartment of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital and Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium.
Suresh SenanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Free University Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Fiona McDonaldLung Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Aberdeen Royal Infirmary · GBAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLAntwerp University Hospital · BECancer Center AmsterdamNational Health Service · GBRoyal Marsden Hospital · GBUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T02481X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately one in five cancer-related deaths, and management requires increasingly complex decision making by health care professionals. Many centers have therefore adopted a multidisciplinary approach to patient care, using the expertise of various specialists to provide the best evidence-based, personalized treatment. However, increasingly complex disease staging, as well as expanded biomarker testing and multimodality management algorithms with novel therapeutics, have driven the need for multifaceted, collaborative decision making to optimally guide the overall treatment process. To keep up with the rapidly evolving treatment landscape, national-level guidelines have been introduced to standardize patient pathways and ensure prompt diagnosis and treatment. Such strategies depend on efficient and effective communication between relevant multidisciplinary team members and have both improved adherence to treatment guidelines and extended patient survival. This article highlights the value of a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and staging, treatment decision making, and adverse event management in NSCLC. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This review highlights the value of a multidisciplinary approach to the diagnosis and staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and makes practical suggestions as to how multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) can be best deployed at individual stages of the disease to improve patient outcomes and effectively manage common adverse events. The authors discuss how a collaborative approach, appropriately leveraging the diverse expertise of NSCLC MDT members (including specialist radiation and medical oncologists, chest physicians, pathologists, pulmonologists, surgeons, and nursing staff) can continue to ensure optimal per-patient decision making as treatment options become ever more specialized in the era of biomarker-driven therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsOncologistsHumansPatient Care TeamDecision makingLung cancerMultidisciplinaryNon-small cell lung cancerTreatment guidelines

Identifiers

PMID33145902
PMCPMC7873339
OpenAlexW3097964344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.