ReviewThe oncologist2021
Navigating Diagnostic and Treatment Decisions in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Expert Commentary on the Multidisciplinary Team Approach.
Review in The oncologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Global burden and trends of tracheal, bronchus, and lung cancer in adolescents and young adults: a secondary analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Real-World Insights into Stage I-III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Spain in the Pre-Immunotherapy Era Using AI Techniques: The IntellyLUNG Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: From Histopathological Classification to Precision Oncology-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Countdown to lobectomy: interventions to improve waiting times for lung cancer resection.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2026Article
- Advancing Lung Cancer Care in Bulgaria: A Successful Implementation of Value-Based Healthcarе.Journal of patient experience · 2026Article
- The Impact of Multidisciplinary Team Meetings on the Survival of Stage IV NSCLC Patients.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Economic Burden and Provider Referral Patterns Among Patients with Unresectable Stage III EGFR-Mutated NSCLC Receiving Chemoradiotherapy in the United States.Advances in therapy · 2025Article
- PTX3 as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in lung adenocarcinoma: a comprehensive analysis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- IASLC grading system predicts distant metastases for resected lung adenocarcinoma.Journal of clinical pathology · 2025Article
- Stage IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treatment and Outcomes: A Single Institution Retrospective Analysis.Thoracic cancer · 2025Article
- Does chemotherapy improve survival outcomes in breast cancer survivors with secondary primary stage I non-small cell lung cancer? A real-world analysis using machine learning models.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- The Detailed Analysis of Polish Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Through Insights from Molecular Testing (POL-MOL Study).International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- UCHL1 Overexpression Is Related to the Aggressive Phenotype of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases · 2024Article
- Application of the 5th WHO Guidelines for the Diagnosis of Lung Carcinoma in Small Lung Biopsies in a Tertiary Care Center: Is Insecurity of Pathologists for the Accurate Diagnosis Justified?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Combined treatment with cetuximab and STA9090 has synergistic anticancer effects on human non-small cell lung cancer.Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2024Article
- A Single-Center Experience in Combined Oncological-Surgical Treatment for Resectable Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC).Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The Best Supportive Care in Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Review
- Does Multidisciplinary Team Management Improve Clinical Outcomes in NSCLC? A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.JTO clinical and research reports · 2023Review
- Treatment decision for recurrences in non-small cell lung cancer during or after adjuvant osimertinib: an international Delphi consensus report.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Lung cancer in the emergency department.Emergency cancer care · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately one in five cancer-related deaths, and management requires increasingly complex decision making by health care professionals. Many centers have therefore adopted a multidisciplinary approach to patient care, using the expertise of various specialists to provide the best evidence-based, personalized treatment. However, increasingly complex disease staging, as well as expanded biomarker testing and multimodality management algorithms with novel therapeutics, have driven the need for multifaceted, collaborative decision making to optimally guide the overall treatment process. To keep up with the rapidly evolving treatment landscape, national-level guidelines have been introduced to standardize patient pathways and ensure prompt diagnosis and treatment. Such strategies depend on efficient and effective communication between relevant multidisciplinary team members and have both improved adherence to treatment guidelines and extended patient survival. This article highlights the value of a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and staging, treatment decision making, and adverse event management in NSCLC. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This review highlights the value of a multidisciplinary approach to the diagnosis and staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and makes practical suggestions as to how multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) can be best deployed at individual stages of the disease to improve patient outcomes and effectively manage common adverse events. The authors discuss how a collaborative approach, appropriately leveraging the diverse expertise of NSCLC MDT members (including specialist radiation and medical oncologists, chest physicians, pathologists, pulmonologists, surgeons, and nursing staff) can continue to ensure optimal per-patient decision making as treatment options become ever more specialized in the era of biomarker-driven therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.