Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33145729›Full record

ArticleEating and weight disorders : EWD2021

Can early change in eating disorder psychopathology predict outcome in guided self-help for binge eating?

Paul E Jenkins, Lydia Smith, Ceridwen Morgan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eating and weight disorders : EWD, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 83% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paul E JenkinsSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6ES, UK. pej106@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1673-2903
Lydia SmithOxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK.
Ceridwen MorganOxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK.
Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study tests the value of a measure of eating disorder (ED) psychopathology in predicting outcome following guided self-help in a non-underweight sample with regular binge eating. It examines whether early reductions in ED psychopathology are associated with remission status at post-treatment.

methodsSeventy-two adults with bulimia nervosa, binge-eating disorder, or an atypical form of these illnesses received up to ten sessions of cognitive behaviour therapy-based guided self-help. Using a session-by-session measure of eating pathology and associated reliable change indices, response was analysed using receiver operating characteristic analysis to predict outcomes at post-treatment.

resultsIn this routine care setting, nearly one-quarter of the sample achieved remission following GSH, approximately two-thirds of whom showed early change in ED psychopathology. Early change prior to session 6 was accurate in predicting later remission. Individuals showing early change did not differ from others on baseline characteristics or rates of attrition.

conclusionData suggest that a majority of those who respond to treatment will do so before the second half of treatment, information that could be used to ensure that evidence-based treatments are used as effectively as possible. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Indexed as

Binge-Eating DisorderBulimiaBulimia NervosaCognitive Behavioral TherapyAdultHumansTreatment OutcomeBinge eatingGuided self-helpReceiver operating characteristicTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID33145729
PMCPMC8437919
OpenAlexW3094513284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.