ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2020
The utility of pediatric age-based weight estimation formulas for emergency drug dose calculations in obese children.
Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dosing Strategies for High-Alert Medications in Obese Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- New Improvements in Pediatric Disease Diagnosis and Treatment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in obese patients: A scoping review.Resuscitation plus · 2024Article
- Estimating Lean Body Weight in Adults With the PAWPER XL-MAC Tape Using Actual Measured Weight as an Input Variable.Cureus · 2022Article
- Human Factor Errors in the use of the PAWPER Tape Systems: An Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability.Cureus · 2021Article
- The utility of pediatric age-based weight estimation formulas for emergency drug dose calculations in obese children.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesIn obese children, when drug therapy is required during emergency care, an estimation of ideal body weight is required for certain drug dose calculations. Some experts have previously speculated that age-based weight estimation formulas could be used to predict ideal body weight. The objectives of this study were to evaluate how accurately age-based formulas could predict ideal body weight and total body weight in obese children.
methodsThree age-based weight estimation formulas were evaluated in a secondary analysis, using a pooled sample of children from 3 academic emergency departments in South Africa. The estimates produced by the 3 formulas (and the PAWPER XL tape as a control) were compared against measured total body weight and ideal body weight. The percentages of estimates falling within 10% of the standard weight were used as the primary outcome measure (PW10).
resultsThis study included 1026 children. For ideal body weight estimations in obese children, the old Advanced Life Support formula, the new Advanced Life Support formula, and the Best Guess formula achieved PW10s (with 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) of 29% (27.2%, 30.8%), 41.4% (38.9%, 43.9%), and 48.3% (45.3%, 51.3%), respectively. For total body weight estimations, the formulas achieved PW10s of 3.6% (3.4%, 3.8%), 5.2% (4.9%, 5.5%), and 19.0% (17.8%, 20.2%). The PAWPER XL tape achieved an accuracy of ideal body weight estimation of 100% (93.9%, 100%) and total body weight estimation of 49.7% (46.7%, 52.7%) in obese children.
conclusionsThe age-based formulas were substantially less accurate at estimating total body weight and ideal body weight than existing length-based methods such as the PAWPER XL tape, and should not be used for this purpose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.