Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33145490›Full record

ArticleContraception: X2020

Measuring contraceptive self-efficacy in sub-Saharan Africa: development and validation of the CSESSA scale in Kenya and Nigeria.

Lillian Whiting-Collins, Lindsay Grenier, Peter J Winch, Amy Tsui, Pamela K Donohue

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contraception: X, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06307002 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Evaluating the Impact of a Contraception Education Game: What's My Method? on Contraceptive Self-efficacy and Clinical Outcomes in Barbados

TypeinterventionalSponsorQuinnipiac UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled70ConditionsContraception BehaviorArmsPlaying a contraception education videogame
NCT06521138 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Transtheoretical Model-Based Antenatal and Postnatal Motivational Interviewing on Contraceptive Self-Efficacy, Contraceptive Attitude and Contraceptive Use: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorGazi UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled72ConditionsSupportive CareArmsMotivational interviewing group, Control group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Fertility Desires and Contraceptive Transition.Population and development review · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lillian Whiting-CollinsJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Population, Family, and Reproductive Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Lindsay GrenierJhpiego, 1615 Thames Street, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA.
Peter J WinchJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of International Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Amy TsuiJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Population, Family, and Reproductive Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Pamela K DonohueJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Children's Center, 1800 Orleans Street, Room 8527, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesContraceptive self-efficacy, a women's belief about her own ability to complete the actions necessary for successful family planning, is a well-documented determinant of contraceptive use. However, there is currently no validated measure appropriate for low-resource settings. We developed and tested a new scale to measure Contraceptive Self-Efficacy among women in sub-Saharan Africa (CSESSA) using samples in Kenya and Nigeria. STUDY

designThe CSESSA scale was administered to women in Kenya (

resultsItem reduction resulted in 11 items in Kenya (

conclusionsThe CSESSA scale is a reliable and valid measure in two countries. Variation of the third subscale by site indicates that certain scale items may be more relevant in areas of low versus high contraceptive prevalence. Further research should be done to validate this subscale in other contexts. IMPLICATIONS: This study contributes a reliable, valid measure of contraceptive self-efficacy in two African countries. The CSESSA scale and subscales can be administered in research (for example for evaluation of interventions to increase contraceptive uptake) or in a clinical setting to inform and improve contraceptive counseling.

Indexed as

ContraceptionContraceptive self-efficacySub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID33145490
PMCPMC7591732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.