Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33145466›Full record

ReviewJACC. Basic to translational science2020

Finding a Needle in a Haystack: Proteomics in Heart Failure.

Sam A Michelhaugh, James L Januzzi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JACC. Basic to translational science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Proteomics of the heart.Physiological reviews · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Cardioproteomics: Insights on Cardiovascular Diseases.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Mass Spectrometry-Based Redox and Protein Profiling of Failing Human Hearts.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sam A MichelhaughDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
James L JanuzziDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circulating protein biomarkers provide information regarding pathways in heart failure (HF) and can add important value to clinicians. Advancements in proteomics allow researchers to measure a multitude of proteins simultaneously with excellent sensitivity and selectivity to detect low abundance proteins. This helps identify previously unrecognized pathways in HF and discover biomarkers and potential targets for HF therapies. Although several proteomic methods exist, including mass spectrometry, protein microarray, aptamer, and proximity extension assay-based techniques, each have their unique advantages. This paper provides an overview of the various proteomic methods, with examples of how each has contributed to understanding the pathways in HF.

Indexed as

2-DE, 2-dimensional gel electrophoresisbiomarkersheart failureHF, heart failureICM, ischemic cardiomyopathyMS, mass spectrometryPEA, proximity extension assayproteomics

Identifiers

PMID33145466
PMCPMC7591826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.