Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33145375›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2020

Towards establishment of diagnostic reference levels based on clinical indication in the state of Qatar.

Huda AlNaemi, Virginia Tsapaki, Ahmed J Omar, Maryam AlKuwari, Amal AlObadli, Shady Alkhazzam, Antar Aly, Mohammad Hassan Kharita

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of radiology open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Assessment of radiographers' knowledge about radiation doses and DRLs in computed tomography departments in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Huda AlNaemiHamad Medical Corporation, 3050, Doha, Qatar.
Virginia TsapakiKonstantopoulio Hospital, 142 33, Nea Ionia, Athens, Greece.
Ahmed J OmarHamad Medical Corporation, 3050, Doha, Qatar.
Maryam AlKuwariHamad Medical Corporation, 3050, Doha, Qatar.
Amal AlObadliHamad Medical Corporation, 3050, Doha, Qatar.
Shady AlkhazzamHamad Medical Corporation, 3050, Doha, Qatar.
Antar AlyHamad Medical Corporation, 3050, Doha, Qatar.
Mohammad Hassan KharitaHamad Medical Corporation, 3050, Doha, Qatar.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe objectives of this study were to: 1) evaluate patient radiation exposure in CT and 2) establish CT Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRL)s based on clinical indication (CI) in Qatar. MATERIALS AND

methodsPatient data for 13 CIs were collected using specially designed collection forms from the dose management software (DMS) of Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC), the main Qatar healthcare provider. The methodology described in the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Report 135 was followed to establish national clinical DRLs in terms of Volumetric Computed Tomography Dose Index (CTDIvol) and total Dose Length Product (DLPt). Effective dose (Ef) was estimated by DMS using DLPt and appropriate conversion factors and was analyzed for comparison purposes.

resultsData were retrospectively collected for 896 adult patients undergoing CT examinations in 4 hospitals and 7 CT scanners. CT for Diffuse infiltrative lung disease imparted the lowest radiation in terms of CTDIvol (5 mGy), DLPt (181 mGy.cm) and Ef (3.6 mSv). Total body CT for severe trauma imparted the highest DLPt (3137 mGy.cm) and Ef (38.6 mSv) of all CIs with a CTDIvol of 15 mGy. Rounded Third quartile CTDIvol and DLPt values were defined as the Qatar CT clinical DRLs. Comparison was limited due to sparse international literature. When this was possible data were lower or comparable with other studies.

conclusionsThis is the first study reporting national clinical DRLs in Asia and second one internationally after UK. For accurate comparison between studies, systemized CI nomenclature must be followed by researchers.

Indexed as

cDRLs, clinical diagnostic reference levelsCIs, Clinical IndicationsClinical indicationClinical protocolsComputed tomographyCT, Computed TomographyCTDI, Computed tomography dose indexDiagnostic reference levelsDLP, Dose length productDMS, Dose Management SoftwareDRL, Diagnostic reference levelEf, Effective doseHMC, Hamad Medical CorporationICRP, International Commission on Radiological ProtectionJCI, Joint Commission InternationalPACS, picture archiving and communication systemRadiation exposureTAVI, Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Identifiers

PMID33145375
PMCPMC7596105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.