ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2020
A narrative review of Barrett's esophagus in 2020, molecular and clinical update.
Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Optical Endoscopic Evaluation and EUS for Differentiating T1a and T1b Barrett's Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Associations Between Non-Genetic Risk Factors and DNA Methylation Alterations in Barrett's Esophagus and Its Progression to Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- A Clinical Validation of a Diagnostic Test for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Based on a Novel Serum Glycoprotein Biomarker Panel: PromarkerEso.Proteomes · 2025Article
- Microenvironment and Biomarkers in Esophageal Cancers: An Approach for Early Detection and Identification.Cureus · 2024Article
- System transferability of Raman-based oesophageal tissue classification using modern machine learning to support multi-centre clinical diagnostics.BJC reports · 2024Article
- The Aberrant Expression of Biomarkers and Risk Prediction for Neoplastic Changes in Barrett's Esophagus-Dysplasia.Cancers · 2024Article
- Preparing Well for Esophageal Endoscopic Detection Using a Hybrid Model and Transfer Learning.Cancers · 2023Article
- Minimally invasive endoscopic therapies for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.Frontline gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Endoscopic Diagnosis and Management of Barrett's Esophagus with Low-Grade Dysplasia.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Impact of the Tumor Microenvironment for Esophageal Tumor Development-An Opportunity for Prevention?Cancers · 2022Review
- Molecular characterization of Barrett's esophagus at single-cell resolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a condition resulting from an acquired metaplastic epithelial change in the esophagus in response to gastroesophageal reflux. BE is the only known precursor lesion to esophageal adenocarcinoma, and can progress from non-dysplastic BE (NDBE) to low grade dysplasia (LGD) and high grade dysplasia (HGD), and ultimately invasive carcinoma. Although the risk of developing esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) in NBDE is less than 0.5% per year, there has been a rising incidence of EAC in Western countries, which continue to drive efforts to optimize screening and surveillance methods. The current gold standard for diagnosis is esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), and there has been significant interest in alternative, minimally invasive methods for screening which would be more readily accessible in the primary care setting. Surveillance endoscopy in 3-5 years is recommended for NDBE given the low progression to EAC. The mainstay of treatment for LGD and HGD is endoscopic eradication therapy (EET). Visible lesions are treated with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is considered first line therapy for flat dysplastic BE and cryotherapy has shown promising results as an alternate form of treatment for of dysplasia. The molecular progression of BE to EAC is a complex process involving multiple pathways involving genetic and epigenetic modifications. Genomic studies have further led to the understanding of the complex molecular landscape that occurs early and late in the disease process. Promising biomarker panels have been investigated to help with the diagnosis of BE as well as aid in the risk stratification of BE during surveillance. In addition, clinical prediction models have been developed to categorize BE patients in low, intermediate, and high risk for progression to HGD and EAC. Further clinical and translational research is needed to help refine markers and techniques in diagnosis, screening, and surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.