Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33145213›Full record

ArticleAsian journal of neurosurgery

A Practice Survey to Compare and Identify the Usefulness of Neuroendoscope and Exoscope in the Current Neurosurgery Practice.

Sunil Panchal, Yasuhiro Yamada, Tetsuya Nagatani, Tadashi Watanabe, Yugo Kishida, Ahmed Sayah, Yoko Kato

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian journal of neurosurgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Exoscopic microneurosurgery in pediatric brain tumors: an ideal tool for complex and peculiar anatomo-topographic scenarios?Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. From Microscopic to Exoscopic Microsurgery: Are We Facing a Change of Paradigm?Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sunil PanchalDepartment of Neurosurgery, GNRC Hospitals, North Guwahati, Assam, India.
Yasuhiro YamadaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Bantane Hospital, Fujita Health University, Nagoya, Japan.
Tetsuya NagataniDepartment of Neurosurgery, Japanese Red Cross Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Tadashi WatanabeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Japan.
Yugo KishidaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Japanese Red Cross Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Ahmed SayahDepartment of Neurosurgery, Bantane Hospital, Fujita Health University, Nagoya, Japan.
Yoko KatoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Bantane Hospital, Fujita Health University, Nagoya, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe present era is of new tools and technique. Handling of new challenges require, better understanding of microscopic anatomy, which requires better magnification and light. Microscope has played significant role in this, use of endoscope and introduction of exoscope have given new dimensions to this field.

aimThis study aims to compare and see the advantages, disadvantages of endoscope with exoscope, will analyze the difference in terms of ergonomics, learning curve, opportunities for training, operating time, magnification, and image quality. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis study was conducted in the Department of Neurosurgery, Bantane Hospital Fujita Health University, Japan. Apart from comparing the specifications of available systems, we conducted a worldwide survey of the two systems through sending questionnaire through mail collected responses and analyzed them.

resultsLearning curve, magnification, image quality, and ergonomics favors exoscope but depth perception and maneuverability, hand eye coordination, tactile sensation, and usage of different angulation tubes favored endoscope to be superior to exoscope.

conclusionThere is more scope for modifications and research in both the instruments. These instruments are not replacement of either and should be used according to their indications.

Indexed as

Endoscopeexoscopesurvey

Identifiers

PMID33145213
PMCPMC7591211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.