Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33145148›Full record

ReviewCurrent trauma reports2020

Prioritizing Communication in the Provision of Palliative Care for the Trauma Patient.

Mackenzie Cook, David Zonies, Karen Brasel

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current trauma reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mackenzie CookDivision of Trauma, Critical Care and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Mail Code L611, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR 97230 USA.
David ZoniesDivision of Trauma, Critical Care and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Mail Code L611, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR 97230 USA.
Karen BraselDivision of Trauma, Critical Care and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Mail Code L611, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR 97230 USA.
Oregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewCommunication skills in the ICU are an essential part of the care of trauma patients. The goal of this review is to summarize key aspects of our understanding of communication with injured patients in the ICU. RECENT

findingsThe need to communicate effectively and empathetically with patients and identify primary goals of care is an essential part of trauma care in the ICU. The optimal design to support complex communication in the ICU will be dependent on institutional experience and resources. The best/worst/most likely model provides a structural model for communication. SUMMARY: We have an imperative to improve the communication for all patients, not just those at the end of their life. A structured approach is important as is involving family at all stages of care. Communication skills can and should be taught to trainees.

Indexed as

Comfort careCommunicationGoals of carePalliative care

Identifiers

PMID33145148
PMCPMC7595000
OpenAlexW3095074422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.