Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33145138›Full record

ArticleCureus2020

Erythrasma Revisited: Diagnosis, Differential Diagnoses, and Comprehensive Review of Treatment.

Parnia Forouzan, Philip R Cohen

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. An underestimated pathogen:Journal of clinical microbiology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Gram-Negative Toe Web Infections.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Tinea versicolor: an updated review.Drugs in context · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Parnia ForouzanDermatology, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, USA.
Philip R CohenDermatology, San Diego Family Dermatology, National City, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Erythrasma is a bacterial infection of the skin typically caused by Corynebacterium minutissimum. This pathogen infects the stratum corneum in warm and wet areas of the skin. Most commonly, the axillary, inguinal, and interdigital regions are affected. A 60-year-old man presented for the examination of a pedunculated lesion on his right proximal thigh. Upon examination of the lesion, adjacent areas of central hypopigmentation and peripheral hyperpigmented scaling were also noted bilaterally in the groin region. Differential diagnoses of candidiasis, dermatophyte infection, erythrasma, pityriasis versicolor, and terra firma-forme dermatosis were considered. Wood lamp examination revealed bright coral-pink fluorescence. Correlation of the clinical examination and the Wood lamp finding established the diagnosis of erythrasma. Twice daily topical 2% mupirocin ointment therapy led to the resolution of our patient's erythrasma. In this case report, the diagnosis, differential diagnoses, and treatment of erythrasma are reviewed.

Indexed as

corynebacteriumdiagnosisdifferentialerythrasmainfectionlampminutissimummupirocintreatmentwood

Identifiers

PMID33145138
PMCPMC7599055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.