ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2020
Should computed tomography and bronchoscopy be routine examinations for chronic cough?
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Flexible bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of chronic cough causes in non-smoking adults.ERJ open research · 2025Article
- A cross-cohort study identifies potential oral microbial markers for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.iScience · 2024Article
- Chest computed tomography scan utilization and diagnostic outcomes in chronic cough patients with normal chest X-rays: analysis of routinely collected data of a tertiary academic hospital.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
- Diagnostic yield of chest radiograph in management of adults with difficult-to-treat chronic cough-retrospective study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic cough is a common symptom of many diseases. Guidelines on cough from different countries recommend chest X-ray as the first-line examination. However, as compared to computerized tomography (CT), chest X-ray is insensitive in the diagnosis of many diseases. We speculate that CT is more helpful in excluding the causes of long-term cough, such as bronchial tumors and pulmonary interstitial diseases, which prevents patients from receiving unnecessary examinations and diagnostic treatments for chronic cough. In addition, a single chest CT is safe and affordable in some regions. Therefore, chest CT may be recommended as a first-line examination for patients with chronic cough. In addition, although bronchoscopy is employed as a further examination for chronic cough, it plays an important role in the diagnosis of chronic cough, especially in rare bronchial diseases such as amyloidosis and foreign body inhalation. Induced sputum cytology was not accepted as a necessary examination for chronic cough, but it becomes a first-line examination until physicians recognize that non-asthmatic eosinophilic bronchitis is a common cause of chronic cough. Therefore, we speculate that the roles of chest CT and bronchoscopy in the identification of causes of chronic cough are increasingly important; in some regions, or for patients suspicious for uncommon causes of chronic cough, CT and bronchoscopy are recommended as first-line examinations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.