Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33145099›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2020

Should computed tomography and bronchoscopy be routine examinations for chronic cough?

Li Yu, Xianghuai Xu, Shanshan Niu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Li YuDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xianghuai XuDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shanshan NiuDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic cough is a common symptom of many diseases. Guidelines on cough from different countries recommend chest X-ray as the first-line examination. However, as compared to computerized tomography (CT), chest X-ray is insensitive in the diagnosis of many diseases. We speculate that CT is more helpful in excluding the causes of long-term cough, such as bronchial tumors and pulmonary interstitial diseases, which prevents patients from receiving unnecessary examinations and diagnostic treatments for chronic cough. In addition, a single chest CT is safe and affordable in some regions. Therefore, chest CT may be recommended as a first-line examination for patients with chronic cough. In addition, although bronchoscopy is employed as a further examination for chronic cough, it plays an important role in the diagnosis of chronic cough, especially in rare bronchial diseases such as amyloidosis and foreign body inhalation. Induced sputum cytology was not accepted as a necessary examination for chronic cough, but it becomes a first-line examination until physicians recognize that non-asthmatic eosinophilic bronchitis is a common cause of chronic cough. Therefore, we speculate that the roles of chest CT and bronchoscopy in the identification of causes of chronic cough are increasingly important; in some regions, or for patients suspicious for uncommon causes of chronic cough, CT and bronchoscopy are recommended as first-line examinations.

Indexed as

bronchoscopychest X-rayChronic coughcomputerized tomography (CT)

Identifiers

PMID33145099
PMCPMC7578503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.