Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33145098›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2020

Methods for assessing cough sensitivity.

Yonglin Mai, Liman Fang, Shuxin Zhong, S Dushinka Shaniya Helen de Silva, Ruchong Chen, Kefang Lai

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yonglin MaiState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Liman FangState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Shuxin ZhongState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
S Dushinka Shaniya Helen de SilvaState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Ruchong ChenState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Kefang LaiState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cough sensitivity can be described as the reaction intensity of the cough reflex to different stimuli which activate chemically and mechanically sensitive vagal afferent nerves innervating airways and lungs. Measurement of cough reflex sensitivity plays an important role in revealing the underlying mechanisms of cough and evaluating the effects of pharmacological interventions. Besides, different responses to cough suppression therapies indicate the existence of cough hypersensitivity. In consideration of these factors stated above, cough sensitivity should therefore be assessed with a variety of cough challenge tests. Based on the neuroanatomical characteristics of the cough reflex, chemical challenge tests have been developed to objectively assess cough sensitivity. In cough inhalation challenges, capsaicin and citric acid are commonly used as the tussive agents to induce cough, which are validated for describing a profile of cough sensitivity to chemical irritants. Recently, mechanical methodologies have also been tried to measure the mechanical sensitivity of the cough reflex. Methodological consideration and selection are necessary for the reasonable assessment of cough sensitivity while employing cough challenges in clinical trials. Thus, in this review, we will focus on describing various methodologies of cough sensitivity measurement and, detailing some factors influencing on the accuracy of outcomes in the experimentally induced cough.

Indexed as

assessmentCough sensitivityinhalation challengesmechanical challenges

Identifiers

PMID33145098
PMCPMC7578481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.