Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33145097›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2020

The present and future of cough counting tools.

Jocelin Isabel Hall, Manuel Lozano, Luis Estrada-Petrocelli, Surinder Birring, Richard Turner

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05042063 (Acoustic Cough Monitoring for the Management of Patients With Known Respiratory Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 43 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05042063 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Acoustic Cough Monitoring for the Management of Patients With Known Respiratory Disease

TypeobservationalSponsorClinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de NavarraRan2021 to 2022Enrolled616ConditionsCough, COPD, GERD, AsthmaArmsHyfe Cough Tracker, Hyfe Air
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Cough monitoring systems in adults with chronic respiratory diseases: a systematic review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Converting a Cough Counter into a Cough Monitor: A Way Forward?Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jocelin Isabel HallCentre for Human and Applied Physiological Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Manuel LozanoInstitute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Barcelona, Spain.
Luis Estrada-PetrocelliInstitute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Barcelona, Spain.
Surinder BirringCentre for Human and Applied Physiological Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Richard TurnerDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The widespread use of cough counting tools has, to date, been limited by a reliance on human input to determine cough frequency. However, over the last two decades advances in digital technology and audio capture have reduced this dependence. As a result, cough frequency is increasingly recognised as a measurable parameter of respiratory disease. Cough frequency is now the gold standard primary endpoint for trials of new treatments for chronic cough, has been investigated as a marker of infectiousness in tuberculosis (TB), and used to demonstrate recovery in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This review discusses the principles of automatic cough detection and summarises key currently and recently used cough counting technology in clinical research. It additionally makes some predictions on future directions in the field based on recent developments. It seems likely that newer approaches to signal processing, the adoption of techniques from automatic speech recognition, and the widespread ownership of mobile devices will help drive forward the development of real-time fully automated ambulatory cough frequency monitoring over the coming years. These changes should allow cough counting systems to transition from their current status as a niche research tool in chronic cough to a much more widely applicable method for assessing, investigating and understanding respiratory disease.

Indexed as

Coughcough frequencycough monitor

Identifiers

PMID33145097
PMCPMC7578475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.