Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33145073›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2020

Bronchoalveolar lavage as a diagnostic procedure: a review of known cellular and molecular findings in various lung diseases.

Kevin R Davidson, Duc M Ha, Marvin I Schwarz, Edward D Chan

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 92 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07232550 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Biomarkers and Respiratory Omics as New CHildren Opportunities - Study of Clinical Outcomes and Predictivity Evaluation - a Multi-cohort, Multi-center Study

TypeobservationalSponsorMedical University of WarsawRan2026 to 2035Enrolled160ConditionsAsthma in Children, Protracted Bacterial Bronchitis, Chronic CoughArmsfiberoptic bronchoscopy, blood sample collection, Respiratory functional tests, Sputum culture
NCT07626073 enrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

h Can Provide the Detection Results of Pathogen Type and Resistant Gene. This Study is a Prospective Multi Centers Study to Explore Using the New Diagnostic Tool of " RPIP " and the Different Detection Methods of Next Generation Sequencing and Multiplex PC R in Patients With Pneumonia in ICU. Further Compare the Difference of Pathogen Identification and Clinical Impact by Different Diagnostic Methods.

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorChina Medical University HospitalRan2023 to 2028Enrolled200ConditionsRespiratory Pathogens
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Mucosal immunity and vaccine development.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. [Expert consensus on airway lavage therapy for adult burn patients (2026 edition)].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kevin R DavidsonDivision of Pulmonary Sciences & Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Duc M HaDivision of Pulmonary Sciences & Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Marvin I SchwarzDivision of Pulmonary Sciences & Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Edward D ChanDivision of Pulmonary Sciences & Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is a commonly used procedure in the evaluation of lung disease as it allows for sampling of the lower respiratory tract. In many circumstances, BAL differential cell counts have been reported to be typical of specific lung disorders. In addition, more specific diagnostic tests including molecular assays such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, special cytopathologic stains, or particular microscopic findings have been described as part of BAL fluid analysis. This review focuses on common cellular and molecular findings of BAL in a wide range of lung diseases. Since the performance of the first lung irrigation in 1927, BAL has become a common and important diagnostic tool. While some pulmonary disorders have a highly characteristic signature of BAL findings, BAL results alone often lack specificity and require interpretation along with other clinical and radiographic details. Development of new diagnostic assays is certain to reinforce the utility of BAL in the future. Our review of the BAL literature is intended to serve as a resource to assist clinicians in the care of patients with lung disorders.

Indexed as

Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL)bronchoscopycell count differentiallung diseasepneumonitissignature

Identifiers

PMID33145073
PMCPMC7578496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.