Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33145003›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2020

Feral populations of

Elizabeth A Mittell, Christina A Cobbold, Umer Zeeshan Ijaz, Elizabeth A Kilbride, Karen A Moore, Barbara K Mable

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The origins and spread of the opium poppy (Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Feral populations ofEcology and evolution · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elizabeth A MittellInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine University of Glasgow Glasgow UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5801-614X
Christina A CobboldSchool of Mathematics and Statistics University of Glasgow Glasgow UK.
Umer Zeeshan IjazSchool of Engineering University of Glasgow Glasgow UK.
Elizabeth A KilbrideInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine University of Glasgow Glasgow UK.
Karen A MooreExeter Sequencing Service University of Exeter Exeter UK.
Barbara K MableInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine University of Glasgow Glasgow UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P004202/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been growing emphasis on the role that crop wild relatives might play in supporting highly selected agriculturally valuable species in the face of climate change. In species that were domesticated many thousands of years ago, distinguishing wild populations from escaped feral forms can be challenging, but reintroducing variation from either source could supplement current cultivated forms. For economically important cabbages (Brassicaceae:

Indexed as

Brassica oleraceacrop wild relativesdomesticationenvironment–genotype associationsferal populationsisolation by distance

Identifiers

PMID33145003
PMCPMC7593181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.