Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33144700›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of obesity (2005)2021

The impact of early body-weight variability on long-term weight maintenance: exploratory results from the NoHoW weight-loss maintenance intervention.

Jake Turicchi, Ruairi O'Driscoll, Michael Lowe, Graham Finlayson, Antonio L Palmeira, Sofus C Larsen, Berit L Heitmann, James Stubbs

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of obesity (2005), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Reference equations of oxygen uptake for the step test in the obese population.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2022
    Article
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Jake TuricchiFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. Psjt@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1174-813X
Ruairi O'DriscollFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Michael LoweDepartment of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6301-9214
Graham FinlaysonFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Antonio L PalmeiraFaculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6508-0599
Sofus C LarsenResearch Unit for Dietary Studies, The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, The Capital Region, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Berit L HeitmannResearch Unit for Dietary Studies, The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, The Capital Region, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6809-4504
James StubbsFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
University of Leeds · GBDrexel University · USFrederiksberg Hospital · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Lisbon · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWeight-loss programmes often achieve short-term success though subsequent weight regain is common. The ability to identify predictive factors of regain early in the weight maintenance phase is crucial.

objectiveTo investigate the associations between short-term weight variability and long-term weight outcomes in individuals engaged in a weight-loss maintenance intervention.

methodsThe study was a secondary analysis from The NoHoW trial, an 18-month weight maintenance intervention in individuals who recently lost ≥5% body weight. Eligible participants (n = 715, 64% women, BMI = 29.2 (SD 5.0) kg/m

resultsGreater non-linear weight variability over the first 6, 9 and 12 weeks was associated with increased subsequent weight in all comparisons; as was greater linear weight variability measured over 12 weeks (up to AdjR

conclusionBody-weight variability over the first 9 and 12 weeks of a weight-loss maintenance intervention weakly predicted increased weight at 12 and 18 months. These results suggest a potentially important role in continuously measuring body weight and estimating weight variability.

Indexed as

AdultBody Weight MaintenanceFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicWeight Loss

Identifiers

PMID33144700
OpenAlexW3096068981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.