Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33144673›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2020

Rapid poxvirus engineering using CRISPR/Cas9 as a selection tool.

Anjali Gowripalan, Stewart Smith, Tijana Stefanovic, David C Tscharke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Rapid Generation of Recombinant Poxviruses Using CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Poxvirus Recombination.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anjali GowripalanJohn Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, 131 Garran Road, Acton, ACT, 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3905-5485
Stewart SmithJohn Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, 131 Garran Road, Acton, ACT, 2601, Australia.
Tijana StefanovicJohn Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, 131 Garran Road, Acton, ACT, 2601, Australia.
David C TscharkeJohn Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, 131 Garran Road, Acton, ACT, 2601, Australia. david.tscharke@anu.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-6825-9172

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In standard uses of CRISPR/Cas9 technology, the cutting of genomes and their efficient repair are considered to go hand-in-hand to achieve desired genetic changes. This includes the current approach for engineering genomes of large dsDNA viruses. However, for poxviruses we show that Cas9-guide RNA complexes cut viral genomes soon after their entry into cells, but repair of these breaks is inefficient. As a result, Cas9 targeting makes only modest, if any, improvements to basal rates of homologous recombination between repair constructs and poxvirus genomes. Instead, Cas9 cleavage leads to inhibition of poxvirus DNA replication thereby suppressing virus spread in culture. This unexpected outcome allows Cas9 to be used as a powerful tool for selecting conventionally generated poxvirus recombinants, which are otherwise impossible to separate from a large background of parental virus without the use of marker genes. This application of CRISPR/Cas9 greatly speeds up the generation of poxvirus-based vaccines, making this platform considerably more attractive in the context of personalised cancer vaccines and emerging disease outbreaks.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGenetic EngineeringGene Expression Regulation, ViralHumansVaccinia virusVirus Replication

Identifiers

PMID33144673
PMCPMC7641209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.