Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33144615›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Key differences between olfactory ensheathing cells and Schwann cells regarding phagocytosis of necrotic cells: implications for transplantation therapies.

L Nazareth, T B Shelper, A Chacko, S Basu, A Delbaz, J Y P Lee, M Chen, J A St John, J A K Ekberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Olfactory ensheathing cells and neuropathic pain.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Effects of nasal inflammation on the olfactory bulb.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Cell transplantation to repair the injured spinal cord.International review of neurobiology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L NazarethMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, 4222, Australia.
T B ShelperMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, 4222, Australia.
A ChackoMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, 4222, Australia.
S BasuMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, 4222, Australia.
A DelbazMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, 4222, Australia.
J Y P LeeMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, 4222, Australia.
M ChenMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, 4222, Australia.
J A St JohnMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, 4222, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7536-3381
J A K EkbergMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, 4222, Australia. j.ekberg@griffith.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-5151-4966
Griffith University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transplantation of peripheral nervous system glia is being explored for treating neural injuries, in particular central nervous system injuries. These glia, olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs) and Schwann cells (SCs), are thought to aid regeneration by clearing necrotic cells, (necrotic bodies, NBs), as well as myelin debris. The mechanism by which the glia phagocytose and traffic NBs are not understood. Here, we show that OECs and SCs recognize phosphatidylserine on NBs, followed by engulfment and trafficking to endosomes and lysosomes. We also showed that both glia can phagocytose and process myelin debris. We compared the time-course of glial phagocytosis (of both NBs and myelin) to that of macrophages. Internalization and trafficking were considerably slower in glia than in macrophages, and OECs were more efficient phagocytes than SCs. The two glial types also differed regarding their cytokine responses after NB challenge. SCs produced low amounts of the pro-inflammatory cytokine TNF-α while OECs did not produce detectable TNF-α. Thus, OECs have a higher capacity than SCs for phagocytosis and trafficking, whilst producing lower amounts of pro-inflammatory cytokines. These findings suggest that OEC transplantation into the injured nervous system may lead to better outcomes than SC transplantation.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlotting, WesternCell DeathFluorescent Antibody TechniqueMacrophagesMiceMice, TransgenicNeurogliaNeurosciencesPhagocytosisPhosphatidylserinesSchwann CellsPhosphatidylserines

Identifiers

PMID33144615
PMCPMC7642263
OpenAlexW3097485069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.