Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33144369›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2020

The association between GP organisational factors and the effectiveness of a prevention programme for cardiometabolic diseases: a prospective intervention study.

Ilse F Badenbroek, Daphne M Stol, Markus Mj Nielen, Monika Hollander, Niek J de Wit, François G Schellevis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ilse F BadenbroekJulius Center For Health Sciences And Primary Care, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands i.f.badenbroek@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1458-576X
Daphne M StolJulius Center For Health Sciences And Primary Care, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Markus Mj NielenNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Monika HollanderJulius Center For Health Sciences And Primary Care, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Niek J de WitJulius Center For Health Sciences And Primary Care, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
François G SchellevisNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOwing to the rising disease burden of cardiometabolic diseases (CMD), prevention programmes for CMD are increasingly implemented in primary care. Organisational practice characteristics and availability of preventive services may be associated with a more effective programme.

aimTo identify possible organisational success factors from general practices related to an effective primary prevention programme for CMD. DESIGN &

settingA prospective intervention study involving 37 Dutch general practices was undertaken.

methodPatients aged 45-70 years without known CMD, hypertension, or hypercholesterolemia were invited for the prevention programme. The outcome measures were an improvement (yes/no) in four different CMD risk factors between baseline and 1-year follow-up on an individual level (body mass index [BMI], smoking, systolic blood pressure, and cholesterol ratio). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used for assessing associations between practice organisational characteristics and outcomes.

resultsJust over half of the participants showed an improvement on one or more risk factors. Marginal differences were found in the four different outcomes between the practices with different organisational characteristics. None of the practice characteristics that were tested showed a significant association with an improvement in one of the outcome measures.

conclusionIn this study, general practice organisational and preventive service characteristics showed no impact on the effectiveness of a CMD prevention programme. Possible explanations could be the effectiveness of protocolised pharmaceutical treatment and only limited contribution of lifestyle programmes on the improvement of CMD risk factors.

Indexed as

cardiovascular diseasesgeneral practiceorganization and administrationprimary health careprimary preventionrisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID33144369
PMCPMC7880196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.