Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33144368›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2020

Progress of GP clusters 2 years after their introduction in Scotland: findings from the Scottish School of Primary Care national GP survey.

Stewart Mercer, John Gillies, Bridie Fitzpatrick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Primary care transformation in Scotland: a qualitative evaluation of the views of patients.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  4. Primary care transformation in Scotland: a qualitative study of GPs' and multidisciplinary team members' views.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Transforming primary care in Scotland: a critical policy analysis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
    Article
  10. Collaborative improvement in Scottish GP clusters after the Quality and Outcomes Framework: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stewart MercerProfessor of Primary Care and Multimorbidity, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK stewart.mercer@ed.ac.uk.
John GilliesHonorary Professor, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Bridie FitzpatrickHonorary Senior Research Fellow, Institute for Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe concept of GP clusters is derived from 'quality circles' in general practice in Europe and Canada. GP clusters commenced across Scotland in 2016 to improve the quality of care of local populations.

aimTo determine GPs' views on clusters, and the robustness of bespoke questions about them. DESIGN &

settingA cross-sectional national survey of work satisfaction of GPs in Scotland took place, which was conducted in July 2018-October 2018.

methodAn analysis of bespoke questions on GP clusters was undertaken. The questions were completed by quality leads (QLs) and all other GPs in a nationally representative sample of GPs.

resultsIn total, 2456 responses were received from 4371 GPs (56.4%). QLs reported that clusters were meeting regularly, and were friendly and well organised but not always productive. Support for cluster activity (data, health intelligence, analysis, quality improvement methods, advice, leadership, and evaluation) was suboptimal. Factor analysis identified two separate constructs (cluster meetings [CMs] and cluster support [CS]), which were minimally influenced (<2%) by GP and practice characteristics. Non-QLs (75% of all GPs) were generally satisfied with the two-way communication with the cluster QLs, but the great majority (>70%) reported no positive changes in various aspects of quality improvement. Factor analysis of these items indicated two constructs (cluster knowledge and engagement [CKE] and cluster quality improvement [CQI]), which were minimally affected by GP and practice characteristics.

conclusionGP clusters are 'up and running' in Scotland but are at an early stage in terms of perceived impact and appear to be in need of more support in order to improve quality of care. The bespoke questions developed on clusters have robust construct validity, suitable for future surveys.

Indexed as

general practicemanaged quality circlesprimary health carequality improvementquality of health care

Identifiers

PMID33144368
PMCPMC7880176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.