Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33144174›Full record

ArticleReproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.)2020

Exposure to perfluorobutane sulfonate and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid disrupts the production of angiogenesis factors and stress responses in human placental syncytiotrophoblast.

Angela Pham, Jun Zhang, Liping Feng

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Predicting Exposure to Perfluorinated Alkyl Substances (PFAS) among US Infants.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Angela PhamDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.
Jun ZhangMOE-Shanghai Key Laboratory of Children's Environmental Health, Xinhua Hospital, Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Liping FengDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States; MOE-Shanghai Key Laboratory of Children's Environmental Health, Xinhua Hospital, Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: liping.feng@duke.edu.
Duke University · USXinHua Hospital · CN

Funding

Effects of perfluorobutane sulfonate (PFBS) exposure on adverse pregnancy outcomes and fetal developmentK01TW010828 · FIC · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI FENG, LIPING · 2017 to 2021
$523k
FIC NIH HHS K01 TW010828
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poly- and per-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have attracted widespread attention in recent years due to their bioaccumulation, toxicity, and ubiquitous nature. We and others have reported that maternal exposure to PFAS is associated with adverse birth outcomes due to altered placental functions. In this study, we investigated the effects of two major PFAS compounds, perfluorobutane sulfonate (PFBS) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), on the regulation of the production of angiogenic factors and stress response in placental multinucleated syncytial BeWo cells using qRT-PCR and ELISA. Using this in vitro model, we showed that 1) PFOS or PFBS treatment did not seem to interrupt BeWo cell fusion through syncytins; 2) Exposure to PFOS at 10 μM decreased a potent angiogenic factor PlGF gene expression, which is implicated in preeclampsia; 3) Exposure to either PFOS or PFBS significantly decreased the production of CGB7 and hCG except hCG secretion in PFOS (10 nM) and PFBS (100 nM) treatment groups; 4) Exposure to PFOS (10 μM) increased the gene expression of the stress response molecules CRH while neither PFOS nor PFBS treatment affected a stress mitigation factor 11β-HSD2 expression. Our results demonstrate that exposure to PFOS or PFBS impacts several key pathways involved in placental cell functions. PFOS seems more potent than PFBS. These novel findings provide a potential explanation for the adverse reproductive complications associated with prenatal exposure to PFOS or PFBS, including preeclampsia and contribute to our knowledge of the reproductive toxicity of PFAS, specifically PFOS and PFBS.

Indexed as

Alkanesulfonic AcidsCell Line, TumorChorionic GonadotropinCorticotropin-Releasing HormoneEnvironmental PollutantsFemaleFluorocarbonsGene Products, envHumansPlacenta Growth FactorPregnancyPregnancy ProteinsStress, PhysiologicalSulfonic AcidsTrophoblastsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1Alkanesulfonic AcidsChorionic GonadotropinCorticotropin-Releasing HormoneEnvironmental PollutantsERVFRD-1 protein, humanFLT1 protein, humanFluorocarbonsGene Products, envperfluorobutanesulfonic acidperfluorooctane sulfonic acidPGF protein, humanPlacenta Growth FactorPregnancy ProteinsSulfonic AcidssyncytinVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1angiogenesishCGPFBSPFOSplacentastress responsesyncytiotrophoblast

Identifiers

PMID33144174
PMCPMC9387162
OpenAlexW3096774302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.