Observational studyChest2021
Airborne Particulate Concentrations During and After Pulmonary Function Testing.
Observational study in Chest, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Home Spirometry for Post-COVID Recovery: A Clinical Validation Study of an Ultrasonic Device.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Nationwide Assessment of Pulmonary Function Testing Practices and Safety Compliance During the COVID-19 PandemicThoracic research and practice · 2025Article
- Aerosol Generation During Spirometry and Simulated Bronchodilator Challenge Testing in the Pulmonary Function Laboratory.Respiratory care · 2025Article
- Creating respiratory pathogen-free environments in healthcare and nursing-care settings: a comprehensive review.GeroScience · 2025Review
- What Have We Learned About Transmission of Coronavirus Disease-2019: Implications for Pulmonary Function Testing and Pulmonary Procedures.Clinics in chest medicine · 2023Review
- Pulmonary function testing during SARS-CoV-2: An ANZSRS/TSANZ position statement.Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2022Review
- International consensus on lung function testing during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.ERJ open research · 2022Review
- Incidence of COVID-19 after pulmonary function tests: a retrospective cohort study.Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas (Cordoba, Argentina) · 2021Article
- Real-life measurement of size-fractionated aerosol concentration in a plethysmography box during the COVID-19 pandemic and estimation of the associated viral load.The Journal of hospital infection · 2021Article
- [Risk Management in Performing Post-Pandemic Pulmonary Function Tests].Open respiratory archivesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.