ArticleParasitology2021
Development of a recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA-EXO) and lateral flow assay (RPA-LFA) based on the ITS1 gene for the detection of
Article in Parasitology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- A miniaturized, frugal RPA assay for genus-level detection of Paracoccidioides spp. in resource-limited endemic settings.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Development of a TaqMan qPCR Method for DetectingTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026Article
- Development of a Multienzyme Isothermal Rapid-Amplification Lateral Flow Assay for On-Site Identification of the Japanese Eel (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- CRISPR/Cas12a-based method coupled with isothermal amplification to identifyFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Rapid and Sensitive Detection ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Rapid On-Site Detection of theFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- RPAcan3990: an Ultrasensitive Recombinase Polymerase Assay To DetectJournal of clinical microbiology · 2021Article
- Sensitive, Accurate and Rapid Detection of the Northern Root-Knot Nematode,Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Angiostrongylus cantonensis is a parasitic nematode known to infect humans through the ingestion of third stage larvae which can cause inflammation and damage to the central nervous system. Currently, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is one of the most reliable diagnostic methods for detecting A. cantonensis in humans as well as in gastropod hosts, but requires expensive and specialized equipment. Here, we compare the sensitivity and accuracy of a recombinase polymerase amplification Exo (RPA-EXO) assay, and a recombinase polymerase amplification lateral flow assay (RPA-LFA) with a traditional quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay currently available. The three assays were used to test 35 slugs from Hawai'i for the presence of A. cantonensis DNA. Consistent results among the three tests were shown in 23/35 samples (65.7%), while 7/35 (20%) were discordant in low infection level samples (<0.01 larvae per mg tissue), and 5/35 (14.3%) were equivocal. To evaluate sensitivity, a partial ITS1 gene was cloned, and serial plasmid dilutions were created ranging from 100 copies μL-1 to ~1 copy μL-1. All three assays consistently detected 50-100 copies μL-1 in triplicate and qPCR was able to detect ~13 copies μL-1 in triplicate. RPA-EXO was able to detect 25 copies μL-1 in triplicate and RPA-LFA was not able to amplify consistently below 50 copies μL-1. Thus, our RPA-EXO and RPA-LFA assays do not appear as sensitive as the current qPCR assay at low DNA concentrations; however, these tests have numerous advantages that may make them useful alternatives to qPCR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.