Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33143713›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

"What should I do when I get home?" treatment plan discussion at discharge between specialist physicians and older in-patients: mixed method study.

Tahreem Ghazal Siddiqui, Socheat Cheng, Marte Mellingsæter, Ramune Grambaite, Pål Gulbrandsen, Christofer Lundqvist, Jennifer Gerwing

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06032715 (Brief Intervention for Reducing Prolonged Use of Sleep Medication Among Elderly), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06032715 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Brief Intervention for Reducing Prolonged Use of Sleep Medication Among Elderly

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, AkershusRan2023 to 2025Enrolled120ConditionsHarmful Use of HypnoticArmsBI (Brief Intervention)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Discharge processes and medicines communication from the patient perspective: A qualitative study at an internal medicines ward in Norway.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tahreem Ghazal SiddiquiHealth Services Research Unit, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway. tahs@ahus.no.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8404-0610
Socheat ChengHealth Services Research Unit, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Marte MellingsæterGeriatric Department, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Ramune GrambaiteHealth Services Research Unit, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Pål GulbrandsenHealth Services Research Unit, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Christofer LundqvistHealth Services Research Unit, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Jennifer GerwingHealth Services Research Unit, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.

Funding

Helse Sør-Øst RHF N/AHøkh, Health Services Research Unit, Akershus University Hospital N/ANorges Forskningsråd 256431
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring discharge from hospital, older patients and physicians discuss the plan for managing patients' health at home. If not followed at home, it can result in poor medication management, readmissions, or other adverse events. Comorbidities, polypharmacy and cognitive impairment may create challenges for older patients. We assessed discharge conversations between older in-patients and physicians for treatment plan activities and medication information, with emphasis on the role of cognitive function in the ongoing conversation.

methodsWe collected 11 videos of discharge consultations, medication lists, and self-reported demographic information from hospitalised patients ≥65 years at the Geriatric department in a general hospital. Mini Mental State Examination score < 25 was classified as low cognitive function. We used microanalysis of face-to-face dialogue to identify and characterise sequences of interaction focused on and distinguishing the treatment plan activities discussed. In addition to descriptive statistics, we used a paired-sample t-test and Mann-Whitney U test for non-parametric data.

resultsPatients' median age was 85 (range: 71-90);7 were females and 4 males. Median of 17 (range: 7 to 23) treatment plan activities were discussed. The proportions of the activities, grouped from a patient perspective, were: 0.40 my medications, 0.21 something the hospital will do for me, 0.18 someone I visit away from home, 0.12 daily routine and 0.09 someone coming to my home. Patients spoke less (mean 190.9 words, SD 133.9) during treatment plan activities compared to other topics (mean 759 words, SD 480.4), (p = .001). Patients used on average 9.2 (SD 3.1) medications; during the conversations, an average of 4.5 (SD 3.3) were discussed, and side effects discussed on average 1.2 (SD 2.1) times. During treatment plan discussions, patients with lower cognitive function were less responsive and spoke less (mean 116.5 words, SD 40.9), compared to patients with normal cognition (mean 233.4 words, SD 152.4), (p = .089).

conclusionPhysicians and geriatric patients discuss many activities during discharge conversations, mostly focusing on medication use without stating side effects. Cognitive function might play a role in how older patients respond. These results may be useful for an intervention to improve communication between physicians and older hospitalised patients.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsPhysiciansAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMalePatient DischargePolypharmacyResearch DesignClinical communicationDischargeElderlyMedication usePhysicians

Identifiers

PMID33143713
PMCPMC7607876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.