Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33143636›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2020

Global mRNA and microRNA expression dynamics in response to anthracnose infection in sorghum.

Fuyou Fu, Gezahegn Girma, Tesfaye Mengiste

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Characterization of microRNAs and Target Genes inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  6. ANTHRACNOSE RESISTANCE GENE2 confers fungal resistance in sorghum.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Contrasting Plant Responses ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Protein Kinase Signaling Pathways in Plant-Frontiers in plant science · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Fuyou FuDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Gezahegn GirmaDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Tesfaye MengisteDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA. mengiste@purdue.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8865-994X
Purdue University West Lafayette · USAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada · CA

Funding

Rural Development Administration PJ01317302United States Agency for International Development AID-OAA-A-13-00047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnthracnose is a damaging disease of sorghum caused by the fungal pathogen Colletotrichum sublineolum. Genome-wide mRNA and microRNA (miRNA) profiles of resistant and susceptible sorghum genotypes were studied to understand components of immune responses, and fungal induced miRNA and target gene networks.

resultsA total of 18 mRNA and 12 miRNA libraries from resistant and susceptible sorghum lines were sequenced prior to and after inoculation with C. sublineolum. Significant differences in transcriptomes of the susceptible and resistant genotypes were observed with dispersion distance and hierarchical cluster tree analyses. Of the total 33,032 genes predicted in the sorghum genome, 19,593 were induced by C. sublineolum, and 15,512 were differentially expressed (DEGs) between the two genotypes. The resistant line was marked by significant reprogramming of the transcriptome at 24 h post inoculation (hpi), and a decrease at 48 hpi, whereas the susceptible line displayed continued changes in gene expression concordant with elevated fungal growth in the susceptible genotype. DEGs encode proteins implicated in diverse functions including photosynthesis, synthesis of tetrapyrrole, carbohydrate and secondary metabolism, immune signaling, and chitin binding. Genes encoding immune receptors, MAPKs, pentatricopeptide repeat proteins, and WRKY transcription factors were induced in the resistant genotype. In a parallel miRNA profiling, the susceptible line displayed greater number of differentially expressed miRNAs than the resistant line indicative of a widespread suppression of gene expression. Interestingly, we found 75 miRNAs, including 36 novel miRNAs, which were differentially expressed in response to fungal inoculation. The expression of 50 miRNAs was significantly different between resistant and susceptible lines. Subsequently, for 35 differentially expressed miRNAs, the corresponding 149 target genes were identified. Expression of 56 target genes were significantly altered after inoculation, showing inverse expression with the corresponding miRNAs.

conclusionsWe provide insights into genome wide dynamics of mRNA and miRNA profiles, biological and cellular processes underlying host responses to fungal infection in sorghum. Resistance is correlated with early transcriptional reprogramming of genes in various pathways. Fungal induced genes, miRNAs and their targets with a potential function in host responses to anthracnose were identified, opening avenues for genetic dissection of resistance mechanisms.

Indexed as

ColletotrichumMicroRNAsSorghumGene Expression ProfilingPlant DiseasesRNA, MessengerTranscriptomeMicroRNAsRNA, MessengerDifferentially expressed genesFungal infection, anthracnosemiRNAmRNARNA-seqSorghum

Identifiers

PMID33143636
PMCPMC7641857
OpenAlexW3096358933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.