ArticleBrain sciences2020
Clinical Immunological Correlations in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Treated with Natalizumab.
Article in Brain sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Targeting IL-33 in Precision Neuroimmunology: Cellular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Strategies for CNS Disorders.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2026Review
- Proinflammatory Effect of Mesenchymal Stem Cells From Patients With Multiple Sclerosis: Potential Modulation Targets.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2025Article
- Natalizumab Treatment of Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Has No Long-Term Effects on the Proportion of Circulating Regulatory T Cells.Neurology and therapy · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Natalizumab (NAT) was the first disease modifying therapy used for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) that was designed with a specific mechanism of action that targets an important step of the MS immunopathology, directly blocking the T lymphocyte intrusion in the central nervous system. Initially, it was considered that NAT carried no biological effects on the peripheral immune response. The purpose of our study was to assess the effects of NAT on the peripheral pro and anti-inflammatory cytokines and to reveal possible correlations between them and the clinical activity of the disease. We noticed a significant decrease in interleukin (IL)-17, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and IL-31 serum levels in treated patients. The lack of relapses during the study was associated with low baseline IL-17 level. The patients that had an increase in the disability score during the study had significantly lower IL-17 and higher IL-1β baseline levels. IL-17 can be used as a biomarker for disease activity but also for progression assessment in NAT treated patients. NAT has a far more complex mechanism compared to what was initially believed, besides modulating lymphocyte trafficking through the blood-brain barrier, it also changes the peripheral levels of pro and anti-inflammatory cytokines in MS patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.