Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33143270›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Technostress Dark Side of Technology in the Workplace: A Scientometric Analysis.

Giorgia Bondanini, Gabriele Giorgi, Antonio Ariza-Montes, Alejandro Vega-Muñoz, Paola Andreucci-Annunziata

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
16.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 174 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Giorgia BondaniniDepartment of Human Science, Università Europea di Roma, 00163 Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2421-3217
Gabriele GiorgiDepartment of Human Science, Università Europea di Roma, 00163 Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7340-356X
Antonio Ariza-MontesSocial Matters Research Group, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, 14004 Córdoba, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5921-0753
Alejandro Vega-MuñozFaculty of Business Administration, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Santiago 7500912, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-9427-2044
Paola Andreucci-AnnunziataFaculty of Education, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 7820436, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-4438-0119
European University of Rome · ITPontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CLUniversidad Autónoma de Chile · CLUniversidad Loyola Andalucía · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article aims to provide a critical review of the scientific research on technostress. As such, global references in this field are identified and highlighted in order to manage pre-existing knowledge and establish future 'bridges' among researchers, and to enhance the presently dispersed understanding of this subject. A scientometric meta-analysis of publications on technostress was conducted to achieve this objective. Mainstream journals from the Web of Science (WoS) were used to identify current topics, relevant journals, prolific authors, institutions, and countries, 'schools of thought' and the thematic areas around which current technostress debate revolves. In this article a significant contribution comes from the use of the scientific activity itself, together with scientometric meta-analysis techniques and the application of this scientific activity, its impact and relational character, to discover relevant countries, research organizations and authors which can constitute a global reference to demarcate this knowledge frontier, and who lead the 'critical mass' of global technostress researchers. This study also distinguishes between the relevant themes studied, with co-keywords plus bibliographic coupling citation, and examines the kind of stress the most prolific authors have considered and, therefore, to discover those topics which should be studied further to deepen this research field, in search of a post-disciplinary knowledge that allows unity of focus in technology and psychology.

Indexed as

Stress, PsychologicalTechnologyBibliometricsHumansdark sideinformation overloadinformation-technologymental healthscientometricstechnostresswork

Identifiers

PMID33143270
PMCPMC7662498
OpenAlexW3095784239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.