Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33143221›Full record

ArticleInsects2020

Effect of Trap Color on Captures of Bark-and Wood-Boring Beetles (Coleoptera; Buprestidae and Scolytinae) and Associated Predators.

Giacomo Cavaletto, Massimo Faccoli, Lorenzo Marini, Johannes Spaethe, Gianluca Magnani, Davide Rassati

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insects, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Integrating landscape ecology into generic surveillance plans for bark- and wood-boring beetles.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Pest categorisation of non-EU Scolytinae on non-coniferous hosts.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Giacomo CavalettoDepartment of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Viale dell'Università, 16-35020 Legnaro, Italy.
Massimo FaccoliDepartment of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Viale dell'Università, 16-35020 Legnaro, Italy.
Lorenzo MariniDepartment of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Viale dell'Università, 16-35020 Legnaro, Italy.
Johannes SpaetheDepartment of Behavioral Physiology & Sociobiology, Biozentrum, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074, Würzburg, Germany.
Gianluca MagnaniVia Gianfanti 6, 47521 Cesena, Italy.
Davide RassatiDepartment of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Viale dell'Università, 16-35020 Legnaro, Italy.
University of Padua · ITAzienda-Unita' Sanitaria Locale Di Cesena · ITUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

University of Padova Dotazione Ordinaria Ricerca (DOR)University of Padova : Budget Integrato per la Ricerca dei Dipartimenti (BIRD 2018)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traps baited with attractive lures are increasingly used at entry-points and surrounding natural areas to intercept exotic wood-boring beetles accidentally introduced via international trade. Several trapping variables can affect the efficacy of this activity, including trap color. In this study, we tested whether species richness and abundance of jewel beetles (Buprestidae), bark and ambrosia beetles (Scolytinae), and their common predators (i.e., checkered beetles, Cleridae) can be modified using trap colors different to those currently used for surveillance of jewel beetles and bark and ambrosia beetles (i.e., green or black). We show that green and black traps are generally efficient, but also that many flower-visiting or dark-metallic colored jewel beetles and certain bark beetles are more attracted by other colors. In addition, we show that checkered beetles have color preferences similar to those of their Scolytinae preys, which limits using trap color to minimize their inadvertent removal. Overall, this study confirmed that understanding the color perception mechanisms in wood-boring beetles can lead to important improvements in trapping techniques and thereby increase the efficacy of surveillance programs.

Indexed as

ambrosia beetlesbaited trapsbark beetlesbiosecuritycheckered beetlesforest pestsinsect visionjewel beetlessurveillance

Identifiers

PMID33143221
PMCPMC7694114
OpenAlexW3096081566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.