Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33143183›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Validation of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory with Coronary Artery Disease Patients.

Julija Gecaite-Stonciene, Adomas Bunevicius, Julius Burkauskas, Julija Brozaitiene, Julius Neverauskas, Narseta Mickuviene, Nijole Kazukauskiene

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Management of Fatigue in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Narrative Review.International journal of general medicine · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Emerging Issues in Occupational Health Psychology.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Julija Gecaite-StoncieneLaboratory of Behavioral Medicine, Neuroscience Institute, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 2100 Palanga, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0002-1560-1402
Adomas BuneviciusLaboratory of Behavioral Medicine, Neuroscience Institute, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 2100 Palanga, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0003-0446-6898
Julius BurkauskasLaboratory of Behavioral Medicine, Neuroscience Institute, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 2100 Palanga, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0002-3928-2151
Julija BrozaitieneLaboratory of Behavioral Medicine, Neuroscience Institute, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 2100 Palanga, Lithuania.
Julius NeverauskasLaboratory of Behavioral Medicine, Neuroscience Institute, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 2100 Palanga, Lithuania.
Narseta MickuvieneLaboratory of Behavioral Medicine, Neuroscience Institute, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 2100 Palanga, Lithuania.
Nijole KazukauskieneLaboratory of Behavioral Medicine, Neuroscience Institute, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 2100 Palanga, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0003-4268-5303

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFatigue is a common distressing symptom in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) is used for measuring fatigue in various clinical settings. Nevertheless, its multidimensional structure has not been consistent across studies. Thus, we aimed to psychometrically evaluate the MFI in patients with CAD.

methodsIn sum, 1162 CAD patients completed questionnaires assessing their subjective fatigue level (MFI-20), mental distress symptoms (HADS, STAI), and health-related quality of life (SF-36). Participants also completed exercise capacity (EC) testing.

resultsConfirmatory factor analysis of the four-factor model, showed acceptable fit (CFI = 0.905; GFI = 0.895; NFI = 0.893, RMSEA = 0.077). After eliminating four items, confirmatory factor analysis testing showed improvement in the four-factor model of the MFI-16 (CFI = 0.910; GFI = 0.909; NFI = 0.898, RMSEA = 0.077). Internal consistency values were adequate for the total score and four MFI-16 subscales: General fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced activity, and mental fatigue with Cronbach's α range: 0.60-0.82. The inadequate value (Cronbach's α = 0.43) was received for the subscale of reduced motivation in both MFI-20 and MFI-16. Correlations between the MFI-16 and HADS, STAI, SF-36, and EC measures were statistically significant (all

conclusionsThe Lithuanian version of the modified MFI of 16 items showed good factorial structure and satisfactory psychometric characteristics, except for reduced motivation subscale.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseFatigueQuality of LifeFemaleHumansMalePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsStroke VolumeSurveys and QuestionnairesVentricular Function, Leftcoronary artery diseasefatiguemental exertionmultidimensional fatigue inventoryphysical performancepsychometric propertiesrehabilitationreliability and validity

Identifiers

PMID33143183
PMCPMC7662819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.