Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33143033›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

K

Magdalena Kowalska, Jacek Nowaczyk, Alicja Nowaczyk

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. PBITProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024
    Article
  9. Unveiling the Multifaceted Problems Associated with Dysrhythmia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. In Vitro and In Vivo Inhibition of theJournal of medicinal chemistry · 2022
    Article
  12. Local Anesthetic Like Inhibition of the Cardiac NaJournal of experimental pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Magdalena KowalskaDepartment of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 85-094 Bydgoszcz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7950-5543
Jacek NowaczykFaculty of Chemistry, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 87-100 Toruń, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4521-8065
Alicja NowaczykDepartment of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 85-094 Bydgoszcz, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Safety assessment of pharmaceuticals is a rapidly developing area of pharmacy and medicine. The new advanced guidelines for testing the toxicity of compounds require specialized tools that provide information on the tested drug in a quick and reliable way. Ion channels represent the third-largest target. As mentioned in the literature, ion channels are an indispensable part of the heart's work. In this paper the most important information concerning the guidelines for cardiotoxicity testing and the way the tests are conducted has been collected. Attention has been focused on the role of selected ion channels in this process.

Indexed as

AnimalsCalcium Channels, L-TypeCardiotoxicityERG1 Potassium ChannelHumansNAV1.5 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelPharmaceutical PreparationsCalcium Channels, L-TypeERG1 Potassium ChannelL-type calcium channel alpha(1C)NAV1.5 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelPharmaceutical Preparationsantitargetdrug cardiotoxicityion transporter proteins

Identifiers

PMID33143033
PMCPMC7663169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.