Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33142986›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2020

Radioprotection and Radiomitigation: From the Bench to Clinical Practice.

Elena Obrador, Rosario Salvador, Juan I Villaescusa, José M Soriano, José M Estrela, Alegría Montoro

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 155 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Radiomitigators: Breakthroughs in Post-Radiation Recovery.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Metallofullerenol ScAdvanced healthcare materials · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elena ObradorDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5934-5543
Rosario SalvadorDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0784-6776
Juan I VillaescusaService of Radiological Protection, Clinical Area of Medical Image, La Fe University Hospital, 46026 Valencia, Spain.
José M SorianoFood & Health Lab, Institute of Materials Science, University of Valencia, 46980 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2846-1311
José M EstrelaDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Odontology, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.
Alegría MontoroService of Radiological Protection, Clinical Area of Medical Image, La Fe University Hospital, 46026 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1662-1592
Universitat de València · ESHospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe · ES

Funding

Elysium Health Inc., NY, USA. noMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad (MINECO) SAF2017-83458-RUV OTR2017-17899INVES
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of protective agents against harmful radiations has been a subject of investigation for decades. However, effective (ideal) radioprotectors and radiomitigators remain an unsolved problem. Because ionizing radiation-induced cellular damage is primarily attributed to free radicals, radical scavengers are promising as potential radioprotectors. Early development of such agents focused on thiol synthetic compounds, e.g., amifostine (2-(3-aminopropylamino) ethylsulfanylphosphonic acid), approved as a radioprotector by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA, USA) but for limited clinical indications and not for nonclinical uses. To date, no new chemical entity has been approved by the FDA as a radiation countermeasure for acute radiation syndrome (ARS). All FDA-approved radiation countermeasures (filgrastim, a recombinant DNA form of the naturally occurring granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, G-CSF; pegfilgrastim, a PEGylated form of the recombinant human G-CSF; sargramostim, a recombinant granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor, GM-CSF) are classified as radiomitigators. No radioprotector that can be administered prior to exposure has been approved for ARS. This differentiates radioprotectors (reduce direct damage caused by radiation) and radiomitigators (minimize toxicity even after radiation has been delivered). Molecules under development with the aim of reaching clinical practice and other nonclinical applications are discussed. Assays to evaluate the biological effects of ionizing radiations are also analyzed.

Indexed as

antioxidantsfree radicalsionizing radiationsradiomitigatorsradioprotectors

Identifiers

PMID33142986
PMCPMC7692399
OpenAlexW3096098211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.