Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33142884›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

In Vivo Imaging with Genetically Encoded Redox Biosensors.

Alexander I Kostyuk, Anastasiya S Panova, Aleksandra D Kokova, Daria A Kotova, Dmitry I Maltsev, Oleg V Podgorny, Vsevolod V Belousov, Dmitry S Bilan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Mechanism and application of thiol-disulfide redox biosensors with a fluorescence-lifetime readout.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Imaging immunometabolismImmunometabolism (Cobham, Surrey) · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Pitfalls of Mitochondrial Redox Signaling Research.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  20. Heme sensing and trafficking in fungi.Fungal biology reviews · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alexander I KostyukShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Anastasiya S PanovaShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Aleksandra D KokovaShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Daria A KotovaShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Dmitry I MaltsevShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Oleg V PodgornyShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Vsevolod V BelousovShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Dmitry S BilanShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, 117997 Moscow, Russia.

Funding

Russian Foundation for Basic Research 18-34-20032Russian Foundation for Basic Research 18-54-74003Russian Science Foundation 17-15-01175Russian Science Foundation 20-15-00280
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Redox reactions are of high fundamental and practical interest since they are involved in both normal physiology and the pathogenesis of various diseases. However, this area of research has always been a relatively problematic field in the context of analytical approaches, mostly because of the unstable nature of the compounds that are measured. Genetically encoded sensors allow for the registration of highly reactive molecules in real-time mode and, therefore, they began a new era in redox biology. Their strongest points manifest most brightly in in vivo experiments and pave the way for the non-invasive investigation of biochemical pathways that proceed in organisms from different systematic groups. In the first part of the review, we briefly describe the redox sensors that were used in vivo as well as summarize the model systems to which they were applied. Next, we thoroughly discuss the biological results obtained in these studies in regard to animals, plants, as well as unicellular eukaryotes and prokaryotes. We hope that this work reflects the amazing power of this technology and can serve as a useful guide for biologists and chemists who work in the field of redox processes.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiosensing TechniquesGlutathioneHumansLuminescent ProteinsMolecular ImagingOxidation-ReductionReactive Oxygen SpeciesGlutathioneLuminescent ProteinsReactive Oxygen Speciesfluorescent proteinsgenetically encoded sensorsglutathione (GSH), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), in vivo imagingmycothiol (MSH), NADHNADPHreactive oxygen species (ROS)redox biology

Identifiers

PMID33142884
PMCPMC7662651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.