Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33142874›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2020

Biological and Chemical Processes that Lead to Textile Malodour Development.

Florence Van Herreweghen, Caroline Amberg, Rita Marques, Chris Callewaert

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Textiles as fomites in the healthcare system.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Florence Van HerreweghenCenter for Microbial Ecology and Technology (CMET), Ghent University, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 33, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Caroline AmbergSwissatest Testmaterialien AG, Mövenstrasse 12, 9015 St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Rita MarquesSwissatest Testmaterialien AG, Mövenstrasse 12, 9015 St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Chris CallewaertCenter for Microbial Ecology and Technology (CMET), Ghent University, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 33, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7697-9188

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of malodour on clothing is a well-known problem with social, economic and ecological consequences. Many people still think malodour is the result of a lack of hygiene, which causes social stigma and embarrassment. Clothing is washed more frequently due to odour formation or even discarded when permastink develops. The malodour formation process is impacted by many variables and processes throughout the textile lifecycle. The contact with the skin with consequent transfer of microorganisms, volatiles and odour precursors leads to the formation of a distinctive textile microbiome and volatilome. The washing and drying processes further shape the textile microbiome and impact malodour formation. These processes are impacted by interindividual differences and fabric type as well. This review describes the current knowledge on the volatilome and microbiome of the skin, textile and washing machine, the multiple factors that determine malodour formation on textiles and points out what information is still missing.

Indexed as

malodourpermastinkskin microbiometextile odourvolatilome

Identifiers

PMID33142874
PMCPMC7692034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.