Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33142745›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

H-WORK Project: Multilevel Interventions to Promote Mental Health in SMEs and Public Workplaces.

Marco De Angelis, Davide Giusino, Karina Nielsen, Emmanuel Aboagye, Marit Christensen, Siw Tone Innstrand, Greta Mazzetti, Machteld van den Heuvel, Roy B L Sijbom, Vince Pelzer and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Marco De AngelisDepartment of Psychology, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9351-5940
Davide GiusinoDepartment of Psychology, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0878-1748
Karina NielsenInstitute of Work Psychology, Sheffield University Management School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 FL, UK.
Emmanuel AboagyeInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, 171 65 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5709-5387
Marit ChristensenDepartment of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7941 Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6246-4383
Siw Tone InnstrandDepartment of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7941 Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-8132-962X
Greta MazzettiDepartment of Education Studies, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2820-3315
Machteld van den HeuvelDepartment of Work and Organizational Psychology, University of Amsterdam, 1018 WS Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6030-1871
Roy B L SijbomDepartment of Work and Organizational Psychology, University of Amsterdam, 1018 WS Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8473-3903
Vince PelzerDepartment of Work and Organizational Psychology, University of Amsterdam, 1018 WS Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rita ChiesaDepartment of Psychology, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6308-8781
Luca PietrantoniDepartment of Psychology, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3966-3800

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 847386
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The paper describes the study design, research questions and methods of a large, international intervention project aimed at improving employee mental health and well-being in SMEs and public organisations. The study is innovative in multiple ways. First, it goes beyond the current debate on whether individual- or organisational-level interventions are most effective in improving employee health and well-being and tests the cumulative effects of multilevel interventions, that is, interventions addressing individual, group, leader and organisational levels. Second, it tailors its interventions to address the aftermaths of the Covid-19 pandemic and develop suitable multilevel interventions for dealing with new ways of working. Third, it uses realist evaluation to explore and identify the working ingredients of and the conditions required for each level of intervention, and their outcomes. Finally, an economic evaluation will assess both the cost-effectiveness analysis and the affordability of the interventions from the employer perspective. The study integrates the training transfer and the organisational process evaluation literature to develop toolkits helping end-users to promote mental health and well-being in the workplace.

Indexed as

PandemicsAdministrative PersonnelBetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Health PromotionHumansMental HealthMental Health ServicesMultilevel AnalysisOccupational Health ServicesPneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2WorkplaceCovid-19 pandemicmental healthmultilevel analysispublic sectorsmall medium enterprises

Identifiers

PMID33142745
PMCPMC7662282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.