Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33142525›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2020

A reasonable correlation between cloacal and cecal microbiomes in broiler chickens.

Nadia A Andreani, Caroline J Donaldson, Matthew Goddard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Analysis of metagenomic data.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nadia A AndreaniSchool of Life Sciences, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK. Electronic address: nandreani@lincoln.ac.uk.
Caroline J DonaldsonPoultry Product Development, Devenish Nutrition, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Matthew GoddardSchool of Life Sciences, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK; School of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
University of Auckland · NZUniversity of Lincoln · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gut microbiota play an important role in animal health. For livestock, an understanding of the effect of husbandry interventions on gut microbiota helps develop methods that increase sustainable productivity, animal welfare, and food safety. Poultry microbiota of the mid-gut and hind-gut can only be investigated postmortem; however, samples from the terminal cloaca may be collected from live animals. This study tests whether cloacal microbiota reflect cecal microbiota in European broiler poultry by evaluating total and paired cecal and cloacal microbiomes from 47 animals. 16S amplicon libraries were constructed and sequenced with a MiSeq 250 bp PE read metric. The composition of cloacal and cecal microbiomes were significantly affected by the age and location of animals, but the effect was very small. Bacilli were relatively more abundant in ceca and Clostridia in cloaca. There was an overlap of 99.5% for the abundances and 59% for the types of taxa between cloacal and cecal communities, but the small fraction of rare nonshared taxa were sufficient to produce a signal for differentiation between cecal and cloacal communities. There was a significant positive correlation between specific taxa abundances in cloacal and cecal communities (Rho = 0.66, P = 2 × 10

Indexed as

CecumChickensCloacaGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsBacteriaBiodiversityEuropeRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA amplicon sequencing3Rscecal communitiescloacal communitiespoultry microbiome

Identifiers

PMID33142525
PMCPMC7647853
OpenAlexW3080668924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.