Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33141872›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2020

COVID-19 gender susceptibility and outcomes: A systematic review.

Ines Lakbar, David Luque-Paz, Jean-Louis Mege, Sharon Einav, Marc Leone

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Tracing SARS-CoV-2 clusters across local scales using genomic data.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. COVID-19 and stroke in women: impact on clinical, psychosocial and research aspects.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The impact of Covid-19 in Chhattisgarh, India: A descriptive study.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ines LakbarDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit, Nord Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux Universitaire de Marseille, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0049-6248
David Luque-PazInfectious Diseases and Intensive Care Unit, Pontchaillou University Hospital, Rennes, France.
Jean-Louis MegeMEPHI, IHU Méditerranée Infection, Aix Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
Sharon EinavIntensive Care Unit of the Shaare Zedek Medical Centre and Hebrew University Faculty of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel.
Marc LeoneDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit, Nord Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux Universitaire de Marseille, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpidemiological differences between men and women have been reported with regards to sepsis, influenza and severe coronavirus infections including SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV.

aimTo systematically review the literature relating to men versus women on SARS-CoV-2 in order to seek differences in disease characteristics (e.g. infectivity, severity) and outcomes (e.g. mortality).

methodsWe searched 3 electronic databases up or observational studies reporting differences between men and women in the SARS-CoV-2 disease characteristics stated. We identified and included 47 studies, reporting data for 21,454 patients mainly from China.

resultsThe unadjusted mortality rates of men were higher than those of women, with a mortality OR 0.51 [0.42, 0.61] (p<0.001) for women. The proportion of men presenting with severe disease and admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) was also higher than that of women (OR 0.75 [0.60-0.93] p<0.001 and OR 0.45 [0.40-0.52] p<0.001 respectively). Adjusted analyses could not be conducted due to lack of data.

conclusionCOVID-19 may be associated with worse outcomes in males than in females. However, until more detailed data are provided in further studies enabling adjusted analysis, this remains an unproven assumption.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Disease SusceptibilityFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleOdds RatioPandemicsPneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2Severity of Illness IndexSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID33141872
PMCPMC7608911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.